Author Topic: 383 Stroker Need New Cam  (Read 25559 times)

Offline msc5195

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 37
383 Stroker Need New Cam
« on: December 28, 2009, 06:07:16 PM »
OK here it is I bought this 1984 GMC SIERRA CLASSIC with a fresh 383 stroker build. The seller told me that the engine had 750 miles on it when I bought it. The specs on the engine were advertised as follows:

350 Small Block
2 Bolt Main
400 Crank turned 10 thousandths on Main and Rods
5.7 Rods
3.75 Stroke
Keith Black Hyper Tech Pistons
Speed Pro Rings
Lunati Cam 515 Intake 515 Exhaust
112° Lobe Separation
300 Duration at 50 thousandths
Pete Jackson Timing Gears
Stock Heads with Stronger Springs
Ersen Roller Rockers
415-425 Estimated Horsepower
480-495 Estimated Ft Lbs Torque
 
The engine seemed to run fine. Although I was being very gentle on it it still seemed to have lots of power. I started hearing a slight tick in under the valve cover on the driver side so a mechanic friend pulled the cover to find a very loose rocker arm on the #5 exhaust valve. We attempted to tighten but it just wouldn't tighten all the way. While turning the engine over we noticed that the valve was only opening about 40% of the others. This is when I was told that I either had a collapsed lifter or either I lost a cam Lobe. HOW SICKENING!! Well after consulting another mechanic I started tearing the engine apart. The cam was removed and not only was it found to be different then what was said at time of sale it was also missing two lobes! Yes, two lobes. As far as we can see everything else listed appears to be as described. The cam that was in the engine was the following Lunati Bracket Master II:
 
advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 300/300
•Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 246/246
•Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .515/.515
•LSA/ICL: 108/104
•Valve Lash (Int/Exh): Hyd/Hyd
•RPM Range: 2500-6500
•Includes: Cam Only

Part Number: 00012

This was a very Lopey cam which gave me problems with vacuum at lower RPMs.

Now with all of that said lets say a stock cam is a 1 and the above radical cam is a 10 then I want something around the 5 range. Something that will be user friendly in a everyday driver and get at least  10-12mpgs or better. Something that has a fairly smooth idle with a little lope. I am looking at two different Howards Cams the two that I have looked at are

OPTION #1
Chev SB 262-400
Application: Max Marine
RPM Range: 1800-6000
Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .465/.488
Adv. Duration: 294/302
Duration @ .050": 224/234
Lobe Sep. Angle: 112


OPTION # 2
Application: Max Oval
RPM Range: 1600-6200
Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .450/.450
Adv. Duration: 290/300
Duration @ .050": 224/232
Lobe Sep. Angle: 112

Any and all input and/or reccommendations will be GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!
« Last Edit: December 28, 2009, 06:51:22 PM by msc5195 »

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19022
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2009, 08:38:14 PM »
I'd pick option 1 if you are nailing it down to two. Now why did it wipe out 2 lobes? Did you do a failure analysis?
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠¯¯¯¯¯'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline msc5195

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 37
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2009, 09:17:36 PM »
Not narrowing it down to just these two so please do make recommendations

Not sure why but tend to think it had alot to do with improper break in procedure. Mechanic friend said he too lost a lobe on a Lunati cam in a drag motor with less than 1000 miles and the local Machine shop mentioned that they have seen a couple of Lunati failures. I have absolutely no idea why it happened. Thought about contacting Lunati to see if they were interested in the cam and the two lifters for investigation. All other lobes and lifters look fine.

Offline TexasRed

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 727
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2009, 10:55:55 PM »
For my 383 for MY 1984 Sierra Classic, I got this one: http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ISK-CL201264/ on the shelf. More accurately, on the window sill.

Offline Prong

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 175
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #4 on: December 29, 2009, 04:12:43 AM »
I picked out a Summit K1103 for my 383. It's got a little bit of lope, bu the vacuum's fine and it performs very well.
79 K10 SB 4x4 383/Th350
79 K10 LB 4x4 350/SM465

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19022
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #5 on: December 29, 2009, 10:11:00 AM »
I've had nothing but good luck with the cheaper summit cams and have quite a few motors out there living on over 100k since I built em.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-K1105/

Nice idle sound, strong vacuum still, works well with good heads.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-K1107/

noticeable idle, ok vacuum at idle (rec. reserve can), must modify heads to perform well

,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠¯¯¯¯¯'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline SUX2BU99

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1478
    • My Cardomain Site. Truck is on Page 6.
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2010, 03:39:08 PM »
I have the Comp Cams XE268H cam and I like it. It could work well in your application too but that's just my .02.

I see you have stock heads. Do you know what kind of stock heads? Are they 'double hump' or Vortecs at least?
85 Chevy Silverado C10 short, wide, yellow, 2wd. Lowered, 60-over 350 with Dart Iron Eagle heads and Comp Cams XE268 cam, TH350 w/ shift kit, 3.40 Gov-lok 12 bolt.

Offline Josh454

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 127
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2010, 05:51:09 PM »
With those kinds of lift you should make sure that 1) Your springs can handle it and 2) Your retainer is not bottoming out on the valve guide.

If you're running something like 882 heads these are WAAAYYY to much cam for them.  You might wanna check out some better flowing heads.  If a head swap is out of the question you might want to stick to something 218 @ .050 or smaller.

Offline msc5195

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 37
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2010, 07:03:41 PM »
UPDATE:

Keep in mind that The very first time I took this truck to my local mechanic friend for some carb work he said that the engine had the wrong harmonic balancer and flex plate installed unless it was internally balanced. I called the engine builder and he tells me that "Yes it is internally balanced as I paid 300.00 to have it done", he even give me the name of the machine shop that done the machine/balance work.

I went ahead and purchased

OPTION #1
Chev SB 262-400
Application: Max Marine
RPM Range: 1800-6000
Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .465/.488
Adv. Duration: 294/302
Duration @ .050": 224/234
Lobe Sep. Angle: 112

After installing the cam I filled the motor with Brad Penn Break in Oil and started the engine. Truck sat there and idled at 2200 RPMS for 20 mins to mate lifters to the cam. After this time we adjusted the timing and the carburetor. The truck seemed to run fine but had a slight rattle. Sounded like a diesel engine. Had a very well experienced mechanic/hot rod engine builder tell me that the rattle was due to too much clearance between the pistons and cylinder walls. I drove truck for about 100 miles and noticed that I had an oil leak at the rear of my oil pan. We put truck on the rack and this is where we discovered that it wasn't the oil pan but appeared to be the rear main seal. We pulled the pan and it all went down hill from here. Once the pan was pulled we removed the rear crank bearing to see that it was literally ate up! Remember from above it was internally balanced. Well, HE LIED!!!! Once the crank was visible I called the machine shop and gave them the engraved job number and they told that this was never balanced or paid to be balanced. 
This was where I made the decision to pull her out and tear her down. All main bearings, rod bearings and cam bearings are bad. I am going tomorrow to pick up a 350 short block to get me back on the road while I rebuild the stroker to a 400hp aluminum head pump gas friendly motor.
Not only were the bearings bad but there was literally .006" clearance between the pistons and the cylinder walls, almost all of the ring gaps were aligned wrong and some of them had .008" -.010" gap in the rings. There were many more problems found but I will stop here.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2010, 07:06:51 PM by msc5195 »

Offline msc5195

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 37
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2010, 07:14:12 PM »
I have the Comp Cams XE268H cam and I like it. It could work well in your application too but that's just my .02.

I see you have stock heads. Do you know what kind of stock heads? Are they 'double hump' or Vortecs at least?

Heads are worked over 882's I just picked them up from the machine shop today and they have new valves and springs installed. Springs were matched to the cam that I will be running. As stated in previous post I purchased a stock 350 shortblock and will install a small cam along with these heads. This will hold me over untill I get my aluminum head 383 rebuilt.

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19022
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2010, 09:58:35 PM »
You used a primer to prime the engine before you started it right?
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠¯¯¯¯¯'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline msc5195

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 37
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2010, 05:10:31 PM »
You used a primer to prime the engine before you started it right?

Yes I used a primer with my cordless drill and pressure got up to 30psi.
It was very un believable how sorry this engine was assembled. Just for reference here are some of the things we found wrong.

2 of the transmission bell housing bolts were missing, 1 was 1/2 way out and the others were loose.
1 flex plate bolt was missing
2 header bolts, 1 from each side of the engine was missing
The first two head bolts were some what loose so we checked the rest with a torque wrench and they were only torqued to 40ft lbs
Wrong Harmonic Balancer installed
Wrong Flex Plate installed
Holley 600 Carb was missing the vacuum diaphragm for the secondaries. This was completely removed from the carb therefore the secondaries we not even opening up.

The guy I got this truck from just had the engine installed and had put 700 miles on it prior to me therefore I do not know what break in oil or procedure was used if any at all was used. It has become a game of he said she said and the engine builder claims he was never paid for the engine which he says that he is owed 4000.00.

Thats all right my daddy always told me that you live to learn and I have learned a lesson here.  With this I am fully involved with the removal of this engine and installation of the temporary engine. I will be fully involved shadowing a very well experienced engine builder thru the complete 383 rebuild. I will be asking questions and taking notes. I am eager to learn and I want to know exactly what I have first hand.

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19022
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2010, 06:43:27 PM »
Def put that engine aside for either parts or a rainy day rebuild. So many people think they can build an engine and can't even put their shoes on correctly.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠¯¯¯¯¯'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline SUX2BU99

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1478
    • My Cardomain Site. Truck is on Page 6.
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #13 on: January 18, 2010, 12:12:27 PM »
Wow, that's terrible  :(  I know that whenever I see any car that's being sold with a brand new engine with 0 miles or very little miles on it I'm suspect of the engine build. If it's got 0 miles on it, how does one even know if it will run well, besides initial start-up??  I looked at a truck that supposedly had a brand new 383 (about 350 miles on it). But the guy who was selling the truck just bought it a few months prior from the guy who built the engine and the truck but he's selling it already? The motor itself was quite dirty and it almost overheated when I test drove it due to the rad being empty. Strange.......
85 Chevy Silverado C10 short, wide, yellow, 2wd. Lowered, 60-over 350 with Dart Iron Eagle heads and Comp Cams XE268 cam, TH350 w/ shift kit, 3.40 Gov-lok 12 bolt.

Offline msc5195

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 37
Re: 383 Stroker Need New Cam
« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2010, 10:30:07 PM »
New Motor Still Having Problems...
I bought a 350 short block from a very reliable and reputable engine builder and machine shop. The block is a 1979 350 block bored 60over. I had my 882 heads reworked at the machine shop. Now with the engine together and running good with 1200 miles on it I broke a rocker stud on the passenger side. We were able to replace the stud without removing the head. After stud replacement I attempted to drive and it was spitting and sputtering bad. We then found out that the coil was very week/bad. I replaced Coil, Distributer Cab and Rotor. Now the #1 cylinder is running cold. If you spray the pipes with water the #1 pipe does not flash. All of the following items have been tried.

•   The #1 cylinder holds 130# compression with NO leak down.
•   Filled with air and the valves are sealing as there is no leak by
•   Sprayed carb cleaner around intake and carb while running looking for leaks but none found
•   All Lifters have been adjusted with engine running. Adjusted with ½ turn of preload.
•   Replaced intake with a n Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake with Fel Pro 1205 high performance gaskets
•   Valve springs checked and they are NOT broke
•   Erson Roller Rockers appear to be moving the same at all of the other cylinders
•   Tried running with a standard rocker arm
•   Verified that push rods are NOT bent
•   We removed the Holley 650 carb and swapped it with 2 separate Holley 650’s from two different trucks which made no difference at all. My 650 worked well on both of those trucks.
•   Listened to the engine with a stethoscope to verify no vacuum leaks small leak was discovered and repaired at brake booster fitting.

I have two very seasoned Mechanics working on this with me. They are both very puzzled and dumb founded as to what the problem is. I guess the next step is to pull the head and investigate from there.

ANY AND ALL HELP WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!