73-87chevytrucks.com

73-87 Chevy _ GMC Trucks => Performance => Topic started by: 327power on December 08, 2009, 09:52:08 PM

Title: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 08, 2009, 09:52:08 PM
Just for kicks...How much power would you have if you took a 292, put in bigger valves, ported the head, used a thinner head gasket, 4bbl intake and carburetor, HEI distributor, and headers? You think at least 290hp?
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Layne on December 09, 2009, 01:23:55 PM
Have you ever been to 6=8.com? lots of good stuff
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: zieg85 on December 09, 2009, 01:28:15 PM
Have you ever been to 6=8.com? lots of good stuff

can you post a link? 
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Lt.Del on December 09, 2009, 02:26:46 PM
In two words...

Aye Lot

Don't shy away from inline engines.  Those puppies are full of torque.  Ever see an 18-wheeler with a V-8 or V-10?  Well, I haven't.  They are inline engines for a reason

Back in my Mustang days, I had an old '68 with a 200 cid inline 6 banger.  I took that puppy out and put in a Maverick 250 inline 6 after I bored it .40 over and shaved the cylinder head/intake.  That thing would scream!  It would tear up my 289 V8.  I could burn the tires off of it.  I loved that engine, and, it got me 22mpg in my old Stang w/ a 3.20 rear 3spd.

www.delbridge.net/vintage.html
  
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Captkaos on December 09, 2009, 02:32:31 PM
www.cliffordperformance.com
http://t6racing.org/

You can make 250 out of one.  Turbo charge it and you really can put some power down.  (It couldn't be stock though)
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: eventhorizon66 on December 09, 2009, 03:56:01 PM
If this is part of your "dare to be different" kick, I definitely approve of this one.  I always thought a mildly built 292 with Weber triple side draughts (http://www.piercemanifolds.com/Images/Catalog/K353.htm) would be awesome.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Layne on December 09, 2009, 04:26:53 PM
Yep Capt beat me to it. Clifford perfomance. Stumbled upon it after I nastily destroyed my sixer when I got my V8
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Captkaos on December 09, 2009, 04:36:04 PM
I have one sitting in my garage that I want to put EFI on it and Put a Turbo on.

Here is some motivation:
http://www.cdpautomachine.com/leo/leo.html
http://www.inliners.org/race/Leo09_2002/leo_santucci.html

Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 09, 2009, 05:35:59 PM
I'm surprised to see so much positive feedback about this motor. Usually its "no way!, that's just a waste of time man!", or "you can dump money into an inline 6 and have the same power as a stock 305". Very inspiring!
I'd like for someone to tell us just how it feels to drive a hopped up 292 on the street. And how it compares to a V8.
I think about dropping a hot 292 in my truck every now and then.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 09, 2009, 06:08:18 PM
Come to think of it...what kind of torque converter would ya have to use for a more potent 292? I think they'd be max'd out on the powerband by like 4,000 RPM. Stock V8 converter? ...Hmm.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Captkaos on December 09, 2009, 11:40:31 PM
292's can be spun to 6000 in almost stock form.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 10, 2009, 12:17:45 AM
So what kind of power could we be dealing with for the street? No lump porting. Just bigger valves, 4bbl, headers, mild porting, more powerful ignition. At least 225hp? Would it go similar to a 350 for example?
This is a cool engine.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: TexasRed on December 10, 2009, 07:36:53 PM
Really, the 292 or 250 would be a decent motor for say an el camino. Something you can use as your work truck. It'd get a small boat to the lake or take some trips to home despot and such.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 11, 2009, 02:15:18 AM
Actually, I agree. An old El Camino or Malibu. The 292 seems to look just right in their engine bays.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: eventhorizon66 on December 11, 2009, 10:44:51 AM
I don't.  IMO, the only thing that looks "just right" under the hood of an older muscle car is a big block. ;D
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Lt.Del on December 11, 2009, 11:49:50 AM
Quote
I don't.  IMO, the only thing that looks "just right" under the hood of an older muscle cars is a big block.

Oh Yeah!
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 11, 2009, 02:18:10 PM
I can't argue with that!  8)
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: TexasRed on December 11, 2009, 07:27:26 PM
An el camino is an older muscle car?
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: choptop on December 11, 2009, 10:25:48 PM
It is with one of these under the hood. My 68 is getting a 396 put in it, but it will be far from stock.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 12, 2009, 03:03:49 AM
Nobody forget...This topic is about a 292 inline six and how much weez you could possibly get out of one with basic modifications. Big blocks do look good though.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: eventhorizon66 on December 12, 2009, 11:16:29 AM
An el camino is an older muscle car?

Well, yes.  It's a Chevelle with a bed.  I guess you could call it a muscle truck.  But I never really thought of Elkys as trucks.

Nobody forget...This topic is about a 292 inline six and how much weez you could possibly get out of one with basic modifications. Big blocks do look good though.

I thought this topic was pretty much resoved when you decided on a 350.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 327power on December 13, 2009, 01:48:53 AM
True...but I figured I'd continue for anyone else that was dead set on building an awesome 292.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: velojym on October 19, 2010, 10:24:02 PM
Big V8 diesels used to be pretty popular, and pretty impressive as well. In the last two or three decades, however, the inline six has taken over for class 8 trucks.

Now, I've recently intrigued myself with the idea of dropping a 4.2 Atlas into a C10.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 1980c10 on October 20, 2010, 06:22:08 PM
I've considered keeping my 250 I-6 my truck wit a 4bbl carb and some headers came to the conclusion that My money would get me further with a small block. Would be cool thiough to do a 292 if budget wasn't a concern.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: slammed79 on October 20, 2010, 06:38:52 PM
I'm thinking about a 292 for the next project, of course I need a job first, I got laid off last month and pickins are slim around here
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: howdydoit on October 21, 2010, 05:35:11 AM
ive thought about dropping a 250/292 I6 in a 4x4 daily driver, just for torque.  I cant see anything wrong with it and it would lighten the front of the truck up a little bit.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: 1980c10 on October 21, 2010, 09:11:54 PM
I have a 250 inline in my 80 2wd swb. It was there when I bought it. I would never do it on purpose. It lacks power for sure, had a 305 in my 82 4x4 lwb and it had gobs more power than the 250. got a little better mpg with the 305 too. same trans/gearing etc.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: velojym on October 23, 2010, 02:46:46 PM
Seriously. I'm seeing some decent 4.2s on eBay. Can anyone think of a reason not to use one instead of a 5.3 in my '86?
It's got more power and torque than what I currently have, and I'm well pleased  with the one in my Trailblazer. It's towed our ski boat and
my old travel trailer without any trouble at all.

I'll post the rest in my truck's thread, so's not to pirate.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: Captkaos on October 25, 2010, 08:10:39 PM
Your only issue with the 4.2 is the oilpan from what I remember.  Otherwise a good motor.
Title: Re: 292 I-6 Question
Post by: velojym on October 29, 2010, 07:48:05 PM
Your only issue with the 4.2 is the oilpan from what I remember.  Otherwise a good motor.

Yeah, it's a bit backwards. The one on my 4x4 TB has the front driveshaft running through the oilpan, but I wonder if maybe it'd work ok
on my 4x2 Chebby without too much trouble.