Thanks for the reply Captkaos,
I have read those links before my post. The difference is I am avoiding and 1/2 ton (C1500) parts altogether to use my existing 8 lug wheels. I am also not using any 88 - 91 C10 spindles.
The 92 - 99
C2500 lift spindles "FTS25887 Spindle For Select GM C2500 Trucks" are for 8 lug.
Fitment:
Chevrolet C2500 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 WT 2 Door Standard Cab Pickup Spindle; 4.5 in. Lift; Rec. Tire Size 305/71R16; Rec. Wheel Size 16X8 w/4.75 in. Backspacing;
8 Lug Wheel
C2500-K2500 ¾ Ton & HD 2/4 WD
1988-2004
8on6.5
So I just need to see if the form factor for the 92-99 spindles matches the 73 - 87 stock spindle. If so I can match up the ball joints.
Existing setup:
stock C20 lower A Arm
Airbagit.com upper A Arm with balljoint spacers (Scary product, advertized as C20 but is really C10, also uses rediculously weak bolts for the balljoint spacer)
3 inch over coil springs (more like 1.5 inches when broken in)
So far I think this is the recipe for the update:
Stock 73 - 87 C20 upper and lower A Arms
92-99 C2500
3/4 ton lift spindles (Fabtech)
3 inch over coil springs (more like 1.5 inches when broken in)
Yet to be determined:
Ream Tie rod end only if necessary (Not running a sway bar so may be able to snake it under) unless diameters are different
92-99 C2500 ball joints(? - See if existing will work)
If needed - 92-99 8 lug rotors/calipers (as they are both 3/4 ton, spindle shaft diameter SHOULD be the same making this not necessary
So I think I am going to get my hands on OEM 92-99 C2500 spindles and do some measuring / comparing with my existing 73 - 87 C20 spindles. Worst case, I have to change ALL balljoints, and run all new parts from the spindle outward. One measurement I am going to beg from Fabtech will be the distance between upper and lower ball joints on the lift spindle. The extended spring will not fit with stock length and I don't want to use another cheesy balljoint spacer. This thing spends real time in the dirt.
Have a look at my plan and let me know where I may be off.
I tried to be as clear as possible but, if I confused you, that makes two of us
.
Thanks again,
Mark