73-87chevytrucks.com

73-87 Chevy _ GMC Trucks => Engine/Drivetrain => Topic started by: westsidek20 on June 10, 2011, 12:34:38 pm

Title: crankshaft
Post by: westsidek20 on June 10, 2011, 12:34:38 pm
Rookie questions,
Im thinking about doing a build to turn the 350 in my K20 78 into a 383, ive been looking at some kits that Jegs sell. I have some questions about the crankshaft, whats the diference between the two or one piece main rear seal? and internal or external balance?
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: DustyRusty on June 10, 2011, 01:44:05 pm
I haven't looked at the Jeg's kits so I can't say for certain as to quality and price.  I think your engine requires a two-piece rear main seal if it's the original engine.  IIRC, all the 383 stroker kits are external balance.  Normally, for ~$200 they can balance it for you so you don't have to take it to a shop when you take delivery.

You might want to do a little more searching on the 'net.  I've seen 383 stroker kits as cheap as $700 - $800 (includes balancing) complete w/ pistons, rings, bearings, cam, lifters, oil pump, timing set, etc.  Check out http://www.northernautoparts.com, http://larrysperformance.recycler.com/services.html, and https://shop.enginekits.com/osb/specials.cfm

Hope this helps a little.

Rusty
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: Lt.Del on June 10, 2011, 02:47:06 pm
you have a two piece rear main.


(http://www.delbridge.net/seal3.JPG)

(http://www.delbridge.net/seal4.jpg)

(http://www.delbridge.net/seal5.JPG)

(http://www.delbridge.net/seal6.JPG)

my 383 www.delbridge.net/install

Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: 1979C20 on June 10, 2011, 03:43:55 pm
Del, if you loosen 4 and 3 mains, the upper seal comes out easier.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: Grim 82 on June 10, 2011, 04:44:09 pm
For the stroker conversion you would be using a 400 crankshaft, which typically was externally balanced meaning you needed a weighted flexplate/flywheel and balancer. Other small block chevy motors pre-87 are internally balanced and use a neutral balance flexplate/flywheel and balancer. Aftermarket companies make internally balanced 400 cranks, but aside from being able to use your original 350 flywheel and balancer I'm not sure if one has an advantage over the other. Your 350 block would require the 2 piece seal as stated.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: westsidek20 on June 10, 2011, 06:07:47 pm

So the kit I've been looking at is "eagle" don't know if its quality stuff or not (would appreciate any comments, its not going to be a racing engine, just street and light offroad fun)
They have different kits, they offer one piece or two piece main seal, so ill get the two piece kit. Now they also offer internal and external balance, what should i get? its the original 350.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: westsidek20 on June 11, 2011, 11:43:28 am
Any help anyone? please...
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: Grim 82 on June 11, 2011, 12:33:18 pm
Like I said, I don't know that there is really an advantage one way or the other, and I have never used Eagle products so I can't attest to their quality. Keep in mind the machining that your block will require for the conversion. Google 383 stroker build and see what you find, or search it on this site. Let us know what you choose.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: ohio hab on June 11, 2011, 04:39:58 pm
I used a Scat rotating balanced assembly from Skip White Performance, bought many, great company to deal with. I use Scat because their Rods are better, much higher H.P. rating, and have had no problem. The kit also has forged piston's. Everything is in the kit, easy to do it your self, after block has been machined. I clearance my own block's very little is needed.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: The dream on June 12, 2011, 08:47:21 am
Thanks for all the info guys, I'm nervous this is my first build, maybe thats why i ask so many stupid questions.

 i will look up on scats kit, although I'm not aiming at Big HP gains, ill stick to the 400 pony range. Now Ive disassembled the engine and it looks like its going to need a 4.060 bore, what do you guys think? is it worth working with this block?
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: 1979C20 on June 12, 2011, 04:11:42 pm
That'll be a 388. I know a few people with them.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: jaredts on June 12, 2011, 05:10:31 pm
Nothing wrong with .06" oversize.  People have gone beyond that and had problems.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: 1979C20 on June 12, 2011, 06:12:15 pm
Someone on the forum said they saw blocks vome back from GM bored .090!
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: The dream on June 12, 2011, 07:06:33 pm
Thats great news. Its just that theres many people out there that don't want to work with anything more then a .030 bore and i was starting to worry, like i said before my first build.  8)
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: DustyRusty on June 12, 2011, 07:44:23 pm
If you're worried about too much overbore, have your machine shop sonic check the cylinders.  That will tell you how much you can safely bore them out to.

Rusty
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: 1979C20 on June 12, 2011, 07:52:29 pm
I was forced into my first build(my current engine). The best advice i can give you is, do not guess and do not take chances. Also, understanding the inner workings of the engine is a good friend. Look up some diagrams of the engine and find flash pictures of how it works. If you underdtand how it works, you will understand how to build it. I would aeperate all of your bolts into seperate bags. I put my stuff in labeled ziploc bags(intake bolts, valve cover bolts, head bolts, bellhousing bolts, etc.). And dont throw anything out until you have replaced and installed it. You never know how hard it could be to find something you need, and you dont want to kick yourself in the crotch for throwing it out. And if you have ANY questions or doubts, ask the forum. You can even contact me directly and i can help you the best i can. i was thrown into my engine build at 16 because my dad was too lazy to help me. I had a spun bearing. So i disassembled and rebuilt my engine on my own. Good luck! Its honestly not as hard as you probably anticipate.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: The dream on June 12, 2011, 08:07:46 pm

i have read topic after topic after topic here, and found great info. Hats off to all the members  ;)
I will ask as thing come up and will post pictures next time.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: Lt.Del on June 12, 2011, 09:00:57 pm
Quote
That'll be a 388. I know a few people with them.

check the batteries in your calculator.  a .060 bore on a 350 won't jump up to that high of a displacement.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: 1979C20 on June 12, 2011, 09:24:03 pm
Del, i wasnt saying it would on a 350. A .060 bore on a 350 would be a 360, but a .060 bore on a 350 with a 3.75 stroke (400sb) crank would be a 388, considering a 383 is a 350 bored .030 over with a 3.75 crank. For every .030 over on a 350 is 5 CI. So, i was infact correct previous statement.
Title: Re: crankshaft
Post by: Lt.Del on June 12, 2011, 11:23:34 pm
ah, yes. i was looking at the fact it was a 350 block.  You are indeed correct. coupled w/ a 400 crank, the displacement w/ .030 bored 350 block would be a 383 --which sits under my hood.