Author Topic: Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?  (Read 5264 times)

Offline sbx22

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 187
  • 1974 1/2 ton 350 sbc
Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?
« on: March 20, 2012, 05:41:50 pm »
Long story short, developed an oil leak between tran/engine which I believe was coming from rear main. No other obvious leaks which I had checked already. BTW, 350 SBC crate motor I picked up from TuffDawg through Arizona. It only has 300 miles.

Ok, so I think I got all the tough tasks out of the way. I'm taking a halftime break right now, maybe until tomorrow. Anyway, snapped a couple pictures of the rear main seal as well as cap. Take a look at it yourself. There are two gouges onto the cap. I DID NOT DO THIS. I found it this way and how it is installed, there was no way I could have used a screw driver to get at it through that angle. I need to replace the cap right?




Also, if you take a closer look at the seals, it appears that the builder used some sort of sealant along the ridge of the seal. It made it a PITA to get the top seal off. I almost cried. From what I read, you're not supposed to use any sort of sealant along the ridge, am I correct? I do not ever want to do this again.


Offline jaredts

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
Re: Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2012, 07:41:53 pm »
Rear main leaking after 300 miles, yikes.  If you're talking about the lines in the bearing I'm pretty sure they're lubrication grooves and you're fine.  I don't know about sealant being prohibited on the seal itself.  I wouldn't think it would be a problem during a rebuild, but you wouldn't want to with the crank in place.  Have you called TuffDawg?

Offline sbx22

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 187
  • 1974 1/2 ton 350 sbc
Re: Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2012, 08:01:34 pm »
I have never seen these grooves used before. I wonder if this is attributing to the leak? Can anyone else chime in?

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19175
Re: Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2012, 08:33:17 pm »
That looks like they took a die grinder to the bearing. Replace the seal, make sure the lip is positioned correctly and I always slightly offset the seal. I would replace that bearing as well. A small amount of rtv at the rear bearing cap to block and correctly positioned pan gasket will help prevent leaks.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline Lt.Del

  • Andy aka:SgtDel
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3864
  • DelbridgePhotography.com
    • www.delbridge.net
Re: Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2012, 09:27:29 pm »
I got my engine from Tuff Dawg in Phoenix.  Send Darl, the engine builder, those pics.  That isn't right.  Pics below are from my Tuff Dawg 383 stroker i bought 7 years ago.  I had a rear main leak and fixed it in a matter of an hour or two.  Note the seal and groove. My bearings did not look like that, that's why i say send those pics to Darl's email.  I have his email if you message me i can give it to you. 











Offline HAULIN IT

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2012, 10:22:29 pm »
Definitely someone took a wiz wheel with some care & a plan & grooved that. I've not seen anything like that, but the person who built it surely has a theory...good, bad or otherwise. Honestly, I've never seen the back bearing itself be a problem (without the others junked from trash or something). The goo on the seal wouldn't have bothered me if it wasn't leaking  ;) Lorne   

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19175
Re: Rear main bearing cap question. Is this right?
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2012, 12:58:05 pm »
Maybe the builder was trying to direct oil away from the rear main seal so it wouldn't leak lol  :D I am curious what his "theory" is too
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10