Author Topic: Small Block 350 vs 400  (Read 95140 times)

Offline choptop

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2476
  • Extended cab fanatic
    • conversiontrucks
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #45 on: March 11, 2009, 08:43:06 am »
Somebody explain something to me. If the main idea is to get maximum wheel speed, why not got with a torque monster bigblock, and gear the truck higher for the wheel speed. It takes the torque to get to the wheel speed, and horsepower to maintain right? Seems a bigblock could easily spinup some 38's and have enough horsepower at 5500 rpm to maintain it. Is this thinking correct???

Yep, that is correct.  I said that earlier:
Quote
the problem is The motor could max at 5000 rpms.  It is the Diff gears that make the rpms at the tires....

Ok, I did see that earlier, but had a brain fart.
76 C10 Choptop,76 C10 Swb
85 C10, 85 K10, 85 K20,86 C10,86 K10 (all extended cabs)
86 C30 extended crewcab

Offline eventhorizon66

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #46 on: March 11, 2009, 12:11:06 pm »
Just so you know, in the 2002 Car Craft Real Street Eliminator contest, a huge boat of a 1982 Cadillac Fleetwood, owned by Jeff Schwartz, won overall with a hot caddy 500, a TH400, 2800 stall, 2.73's in the rear, and 26" tires.  His 1/4 was an 11.80 @ 116.05.
'85 C10 SWB 350 700R4 TKO600

Offline Fishtail8

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 10
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #47 on: March 11, 2009, 09:06:19 pm »
In my old 4x4, I ran a 406,4L80E/205, 4:10's with 36's.  Here's the simple build we did for the 406.

Stock block, stock crank, main studs, 5.7 inch rod, custom forged piston, balanced, 10:1, Comp XE268H, steel Pro-Action 180cc heads with 1.6 roller rockers, Performer RPM intake, 750 vac sec Holley.  Dyno'd at 392hp & 444 ft-lbs.  400+ft-lbs from 2500 up. I wheeled the shoot outta that engine, kept the rpm's under 5000, and never have had a problem.  In low range it was more than enough to get the job done. I can scan the dyno sheet if you want. 

Build for torque, screw the horsepower. 

Off topic a bit, when I parted the truck out, I threw the engine in an ole Pontiac I was building, and being 5yrs old and abused, it still runs 12.80's @105.  Done... Build away... 






Offline cracker0169

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • Myspace
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #48 on: March 11, 2009, 09:31:50 pm »
I vote 377 and 5.13s  ;D

Throw some big Dart heads on there and a big roller and let her eat!
1981 K10, 350 - SM465 - NP205 sittin' on 37's
1983 C10, 305HO - TH400

Offline Layne

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #49 on: October 08, 2009, 12:40:51 am »
I was once told you can put a 350 crank in a 400 and make a 377 that would "run 9 grand all day"
77 c-10 - 77 400 86 700r4 "Emmy"
83 citation - 2.5L Four on the Floor!
88 sierra - reman 350 700r4 "Eleanor"
All normal practicality and rational money handling goes out of the window when it comes to my truck.

Offline eventhorizon66

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #50 on: October 08, 2009, 09:22:41 am »
You were told wrong.  Any SBC has to be purpose built to "run 9 grand all day".
'85 C10 SWB 350 700R4 TKO600

Offline bigkountry

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 453
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #51 on: October 08, 2009, 11:55:00 am »
377 is a high revving engine, but as pointed out above it has to be purpose built. You are talking big bucks right there.
81 Scottsdale K10 "Under construction"

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #52 on: October 08, 2009, 11:59:35 am »
Shame on you for crushing that malibu;  It looked like it had many more miles in it.

i mean seriously.

Offline Layne

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #53 on: October 08, 2009, 08:21:28 pm »
That's what I thought. lol. So a .30 over 350 is a 355, then with a 400 crank it's a 383 right? Then a 400 .30 over is a 406, but if you use a 350 crank it's a 377? Can you make a reverse 383?
77 c-10 - 77 400 86 700r4 "Emmy"
83 citation - 2.5L Four on the Floor!
88 sierra - reman 350 700r4 "Eleanor"
All normal practicality and rational money handling goes out of the window when it comes to my truck.

Offline eventhorizon66

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #54 on: October 08, 2009, 09:04:30 pm »
That's what I thought. lol. So a .30 over 350 is a 355, then with a 400 crank it's a 383 right? Then a 400 .30 over is a 406, but if you use a 350 crank it's a 377? Can you make a reverse 383?

That's all correct.  But what do you mean by a reverse 383?
'85 C10 SWB 350 700R4 TKO600

Offline Layne

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #55 on: October 08, 2009, 09:09:00 pm »
400 block, 350 crank? that's a 377? so do you bore it out? I confused myself, but there's so many variables, I just wanted to clarify for myself lol!
77 c-10 - 77 400 86 700r4 "Emmy"
83 citation - 2.5L Four on the Floor!
88 sierra - reman 350 700r4 "Eleanor"
All normal practicality and rational money handling goes out of the window when it comes to my truck.

Offline eventhorizon66

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #56 on: October 08, 2009, 09:29:44 pm »
A 377 is technically a 400 block bored 0.030" over with a 350 crank (3.48").  IMO, for any street engine, go for cubes first.  If I had a good 400 block, I would never use less than a 3.75" crank in it.  Revving high is not of any importance in a street engine.  Power and durability are.  So 406 cubes are better than 377 cubes, period.
'85 C10 SWB 350 700R4 TKO600

Offline Layne

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #57 on: October 08, 2009, 09:37:52 pm »
Cool! Thanks for the clarification. Now I can act like I know it all in front of my friends!! lol! They're all about the b16 hondas or whatever they are. Gotta stick to my V-8s
77 c-10 - 77 400 86 700r4 "Emmy"
83 citation - 2.5L Four on the Floor!
88 sierra - reman 350 700r4 "Eleanor"
All normal practicality and rational money handling goes out of the window when it comes to my truck.

Offline Gusgusa1

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 96
  • Gasket
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #58 on: October 14, 2013, 09:22:27 am »
I love all the info but with out purpose building which would be better at stock 350 tbi or a stock 400? Used for a daily driver and some weekend mud/ bush trails.
2002 gmc 1500hd 6.0 4x4
1987 gmc Sierra classic 1500 350ss 4x4
1986 silverado 350 4x4
1984 scottsdale 305 quad jet 4x4 4spd manual
1982 camaro z28 350 w vortec heads spool

Offline rich weyand

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Small Block 350 vs 400
« Reply #59 on: October 14, 2013, 10:08:28 am »
Depends.  350s are everywhere, the parts are available and cheap, and you can usually find stock parts salvage.  It's pretty easy to get in the neighborhood of 400 ft.lbs. out of a 350, even with stock heads, if you cam it right.

That having been said, the old posts above are right: torque is what matters, and there's no replacement for displacement.  The 400 can be set up for more torque than the 350 with the same amount of work.

Gas mileage in a 350 TBI will be much better than from a carbed anything, and more cubes generally speaking means more gas.
Rich

"Working Girl": 1978 K-10 RCSB 350/TH350/NP203 +2/+3 Tuff Country lift