Author Topic: Camel Hump Heads  (Read 24926 times)

Offline Kusto

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 23
Camel Hump Heads
« on: March 21, 2009, 12:18:00 am »
I have a set of 1.94 Camel Hump heads from 1967 327 engine.  I am thinking of getting these machined out to 2.02's and using them on a freshly built 350.  I will be running a Holley 650cfm carb and an air gap intake with an additional 2" throttle body spacer.  This setup will be pushing a fresh built TH 400 transmission with extra clutches, shift kit and other aftermarket internals.  The truck is a 1948 Ford on a 74 Chevy 1/2 ton chassis that has been shortened to fit this application.  It will be a cruiser and just be-bopping around town and roasting the tires at the lights.  I want to get as much low end torque as possible and am not really interested in top speed.  Any suggestions on cams and torque converter specs would be greatly appreciated?

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19181
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2009, 01:52:24 am »
We need more details. What size tires are you running? What's the rear end final drive ratio? What's the combustion chamber volume? Give more detail on the engine and it's implements.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline Russ130

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 263
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2009, 08:22:49 am »
Vile - I think he want us to tell him what parameters are best for just roasting the tires.

Kusto - A line lock and/or trans brake would help with roasting tires too.

Offline Kusto

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 23
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2009, 03:12:43 pm »
Hey guys, I do understand that you require some additional detail.  Here is where I'm at right now.

I just purchased a freshly rebuilt 350 engine from out of town, It will arrive Tuesday next week.  I purchased it from a polish gentleman that had a engine shop build it for him for use in a street rod application, 2 years ago, he gave up on his project for financial reasons and sold the rod for parts and kept the engine and transmission.  Since then he does not recall the exact parts that were used in the engine, but what he does know that it was better than stock on all parts.....I need to do a little home work and see what is actually in the engine.  Also it has never been fired and rockers have not been set.  I will provide some additional detail as soon as it arrives and I get a chance to look it over.  It comes with a 700R4 AOD trans that has been serviced and shift kit installed, but I don't need OD so will be selling it. 

The question I have is if it is worthwhile getting my camel hump 1.94 heads converted to 2.02 for this application and is there any way I can determine what cam is already in the engine without removing it?  Is there a number stamped on the face where the timing gear is mounted?

As previously indicated I am looking for low end torque rather than top end speed.  Since the truck is lowered 5" I had to go with ceramic coated shorty headers (Camaro), I understand that this is counter productive for low end torque but no room for full length headers.  I also will be swapping out the HEI distributor with a MSD pro billet distributor with blaster 2 coil and MSD plug wires.

I will also be port matching the intake with the heads.  The intake is a high rise airgap and may also be adding a a 2" TB spacer for additional atomization of the fuel.  I will be using and electric fuel pump with pressure regulator for optimum fuel delivery. 

As for wheels and tires, I am going to be checking out what I can fit under the fenders with appropriate back spacing/off set.  Will likely be 17" rims and low profile tires (not sure yet) .  I will provide wheel info as soon as I can determine what I will be running.

Please let me know what additional information you may require and I will try and get it for you.  I will be running the numbers on the engine and heads as soon as it arrives on Tuesday.  Anything I should watch out for?

And yes I know a line lock is a must....
« Last Edit: March 21, 2009, 03:15:10 pm by Kusto »

Offline Kusto

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 23
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2009, 03:24:55 pm »
Combustion chamber volume, I'm guessing 64cc but not 100% sure.

Offline Russ130

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 263
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2009, 04:30:44 pm »
well like you said you don't know what is on the motor as it sits right now. Could be better heads already on it. If they are stock smog heads then absolutely put the work into the double humps. Don't forget to have them ported and polished since that is what does seperate them from other stock heads really.

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19181
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2009, 09:38:57 pm »
Vile - I think he want us to tell him what parameters are best for just roasting the tires.

Kusto - A line lock and/or trans brake would help with roasting tires too.

Russ130, his post does not state "I want parameters for just roasting tires" Nor is there such parameters except for saying build as much overkill as possible. If he wants the best advice from us experienced builders we need as much detail as possible.


Now are you on a tight budget? The camel hump heads were the vortec heads of their day but are nothing special with todays technology and may not be worth pumping $$ into. I have a set of 2.02 Camel humps wasting away as they've been surpassed by better and better heads that seem to fall in my lap. To determine lobe lift you can use a dial indicator affixed to the back of the rocker on the intake and exhaust. Multiply the lift by the rocker ratio (ex. .300 lobe lift x 1.5 rocker ratio = .450 valve lift etc). If you already have the 700R4 ready to go there's nothing wrong with that just build more gear into the rear end. What gears are back there now? Are you planning to swap the cam? If so I'd invest in a roller cam retrofit if you can afford it. Let us know and post some pix of your project too.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline HAULIN IT

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2009, 12:56:18 am »
It looks to me your real question is "Should I spend the money to go from 1.94 to 2.02 valves", is this correct? If so, no. Back to Vile's "Were good heads, but now...". If you want to use them fine, get a good valve job done & be done with it. Assuming that you have 76cc chambers now, you will raise your compression some (which most likely you could use). When the machine shop says "They need guides, seats, a couple valves, surfaced, ect. resort back to Vile's "Were good heads, but now...".
 On a side note, if they are '67 heads, they will not have the front bolt holes, which will lead to alternator bracket changing plans. The truth is, try to sell them to someone who wants/needs them for a "period correct" vehicle ('60's hot rod or old streetrod built to look like it was built in the '60's) & get yourself a set of newer heads. My Two cents, Lorne   

Offline Chevalade

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 329
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2009, 12:22:06 pm »
Look into RHS for heads they are really nice, avail in 2 different cc sizes and are very cost efficient.

Offline Kusto

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 23
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2009, 08:56:47 pm »
Just trying to keep costs down.  I can get them converted to 2.02s for $600.00 new valves and guides, etc. 

Offline Brown 84

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 11
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2009, 10:16:55 pm »
600 bucks would get you a set of Vortecs.  will have to add the proper intake manifold but they will provide more power than unported 2.02 humpers.  *However*.  some 2.02 Camel humps, good compression ratio, decent cam, and rear gear will provide a lot of tire smoke.  Just gotta know whats in the motor.

Derek
1974 Short Step.  350/Saginaw 4 Speed

Offline Kusto

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 23
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2009, 07:06:59 pm »
600 bucks would get you a set of Vortecs.  will have to add the proper intake manifold but they will provide more power than unported 2.02 humpers.  *However*.  some 2.02 Camel humps, good compression ratio, decent cam, and rear gear will provide a lot of tire smoke.  Just gotta know whats in the motor.

Derek

Well Derek, if you can find me a set delivered here in Alberta Canada for that price I'll take them and give you a finders fee.......Is there a Vortec head that is better or worse that the other?

Offline 75 C20

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 372
« Last Edit: March 23, 2009, 08:15:13 pm by 75 C20 »
1975 Custom Deluxe 20 350 SM465 2WD Longbed
1979 Custom Deluxe 20 400 SM465 2WD Longbed
1968 Custom Sport Truck 20 327 TH400 2WD Longbed
1985 Silverado 10 305 700R4 2WD Longbed
1969 Pontiac GTO 400 Turbo350
2008 GMC 2500HD 6.0 6spd 4X4 Longbed

Offline Kusto

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 23
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2009, 08:39:54 pm »
Once I run the numbers on the current engine set up, I then will report what it is I have, but it'd be funny if the heads were already Vortec......

Offline Kusto

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 23
Re: Camel Hump Heads
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2009, 08:47:50 pm »
here ya go:
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=NAL%2D12558060&N=700+400129+4294867081+115&autoview=sku   

http://paceperformance.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=24756

http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=NAL%2D12529093&N=700+400129+4294867081+115&autoview=sku



now about that finders fee ;D

Nice try, but the heads are from the US and range from 279.99 to 299.95 each plus shipping, duty and exchange so I'd still likely be looking at close to or over $1000.00......then theres the vortec intake issue?