Author Topic: Digital Camera's  (Read 9280 times)

Offline Jay2D2

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 114
Re: Digital Camera's
« Reply #15 on: February 23, 2009, 09:40:51 am »
I believe what I had was a Canon A560 and it was the best one ive owned yeat but after a hard fall on cement the lens mechanism dented inside and it jammed the lens from moving in and out.  Repair estimate was like $250 and I believe I only paid $199 for the camera 2 years ago.

So this weekend I picked up another canon this weekend, an SD1000is or 1100is... something like that.
Havnt tried her out yet but looks good so far. Comes with its own rechargable batt. pack, 8MPX. etc...

When I was shopping the first time around the best advice I was told was to get one with a glass lens over a plastic lens. Most canon have a glass lens.

Offline smitty77

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 215
Re: Digital Camera's
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2009, 09:46:21 am »
I have a Nikon D50 (precedes the smaller D40) and it takes awesome photos.  Downside is lugging a bigger camera with you.  This one won't go in a shirt pocket, but you can't take better photos with a Point-and-shoot, period.  Coupled with the 55-135 zoom lens with image stabilization, it will turn any hack into a good photographer.  With the IS turned on, I can shoot at max zoom without a tripod and don't get any blurriness.  I bought it mostly for taking action shots of the little ones tearing around as it can fire 5 frames per second (non-flash).  It wasn't cheap, but I've seen some good deals on the D40 lately so it may be worth a look.  You won't be disappointed in the image quality.

I also have a Panasonic Lumix L-75 (I think that's the model), which is point and shoot, runs on AA batteries, and cost me $99 a year and a half ago.  The downside is it gets grainy and blurry in low-light situations, and the flash tends to wash things out.  Good little budget camera, but it won't win me any photo contests.

My wife just bought a Kodak Easy share 913 (I think, I stink at remembering multiple model numbers), and she says it works great.  Proprietary battery, which all the small ones have to save space and weight, lots of mega pixels, and small.  Haven't taken enough photos to render judgment on low light or action shots.  For $123 at Wal-Mart (with some extra goodies like a case and lens cloth) the price is hard to beat.

Megapixels have reached their useful capacity as a quality indicator long ago.  Anything over 6mp will be enough for anyone as long as you print to 8x10 or smaller.  Bigger photos may be an issue at 6mp and less, but I gather most here aren't concerned with large prints.

Good luck with whatever you choose.  Just keep in mind the useful life of these things gets shorter every year.  If you get more than 3 years out of one, consider yourself lucky.  As Jay suggested, go for good quality lens with OPTICAL zoom (not digital zoom), and look into image stabilization.  It will eliminate camera shake for those zoom shots.

Online zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: Digital Camera's
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2009, 10:30:25 am »
I have had great luck with my Olympus.  5 years and the only thing was the battery wouldn't keep a charge very long.  Replaced it and no problems.  Great pics, and software editing tools.
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline hotrod24

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
Re: Digital Camera's
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2009, 10:51:43 am »
i have a sanyo great camera it is 7.1 pixels
1980 1/2 ton shortbed project...
1978 pontiac grand prix...

Offline muddnutz

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 53
Re: Digital Camera's
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2009, 07:24:26 pm »
  I use a kodak easyshare ts real easy to use takes good pics.I use the dock and you can download and print from its all good