Author Topic: Headers??? Too many choices  (Read 8821 times)

Offline nlauffer

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 274
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2013, 08:33:30 am »
One of my ideas was to run a y pipe into single 3" exiting in front of passenger rear wheel with rectangular tips. This idea has lead to my search for better or easier. Because if I use 3". Am I wasting money because stock manifolds are much smaller so shouldn't I use headers or hi po Camarillo manifolds.

Offline 79brent

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 126
  • Shake and Bake!
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2013, 10:16:39 am »
Even with stock manifolds, a 3" exhaust will give you better power than say a 2.25 or 2.5. Then when you get headers down the road, it'll give you even more power and you wont have to worry about doing the exhaust again to get the exhaust flow you want with the headers.
1979 Chevy C10 Silverado package. 350/350

"Lifes a garden DIG it"

Offline nlauffer

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 274
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #17 on: May 30, 2013, 01:42:13 pm »
So, are there any other thoughts on manifold vs header.  I know the generic thoughts, but I am curious to here from some more of the "pro" manifold people.

Offline ehjorten

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2013, 08:58:57 am »
I would never go with a Hedman ball and socket header again!  I have the Elite coated ball and socket headers on my '77 K20 and the ball and socket flange has been nothing but a complete pain since day one!!!  The design of the Hedman ball and socket flange is too weak, and the 3 point mounting causes un-even bolt torque.  Still the bolted joint is a soft joint and the nuts are constantly coming loose.  I started off with the regular hardware and within a month the nuts came loose, it started leaking, and my exhaust pipes started moving around.  I double nuted them and within a month the same thing happened.  Then I had the nuts tack welded to prevent them from coming loose and guess what...it got loose again!!!  The constand heat cycling of the connection causes the bolts to stretch and the socket flange started opening-up and pulling farther over the ball.  I went to double nut and high-temp loc-tite and they still loosened up.  An OEM ball and socket with only 2 bolts and springs under the bolt head would work much better.

I went this route on the suggestion of a friend and that you don't have to mess with collector gaskets!  But...I didn't think about the fact that I have vehicles with regular collectors and gaskets and I don't have a problem with them in the first place!  I really wish I would have just got the standard collector flanges.  The bolted design there is much better and much less prone to the fasteners loosening.
-Erik-
1991 V3500 - Gen V TBI 454, 4L80E, NP205, 14 bolt FF, D60, 8" Lift on 35s
1977 K20 Silverado - 350, THM350, NP203, 14 bolt FF, D44, Stock Lift on 31s
1969 Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe - EFI350, THM350
1968 Chevrolet Step-side Pickup - 300HP L6

Offline rich weyand

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #19 on: May 31, 2013, 09:04:40 am »
I would never go with a Hedman ball and socket header again!  I have the Elite coated ball and socket headers on my '77 K20 and the ball and socket flange has been nothing but a complete pain since day one!!!  The design of the Hedman ball and socket flange is too weak, and the 3 point mounting causes un-even bolt torque.  Still the bolted joint is a soft joint and the nuts are constantly coming loose.  I started off with the regular hardware and within a month the nuts came loose, it started leaking, and my exhaust pipes started moving around.  I double nuted them and within a month the same thing happened.  Then I had the nuts tack welded to prevent them from coming loose and guess what...it got loose again!!!  The constand heat cycling of the connection causes the bolts to stretch and the socket flange started opening-up and pulling farther over the ball.  I went to double nut and high-temp loc-tite and they still loosened up.  An OEM ball and socket with only 2 bolts and springs under the bolt head would work much better.

I went this route on the suggestion of a friend and that you don't have to mess with collector gaskets!  But...I didn't think about the fact that I have vehicles with regular collectors and gaskets and I don't have a problem with them in the first place!  I really wish I would have just got the standard collector flanges.  The bolted design there is much better and much less prone to the fasteners loosening.

Wow.  Thanks for that.  This very topic came up last night, so it's really good to know that.
Rich

"Working Girl": 1978 K-10 RCSB 350/TH350/NP203 +2/+3 Tuff Country lift

Offline nlauffer

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 274
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2013, 09:20:50 am »
I like this forum for times like this.  So many people available and willing to discuss ideas.  No right or wrong answers, just alot of trial and error.

First off, sorry for some of my spelling (Camarillo).  Some of this has been posted from my Iphone and I am still getting used to the auto fill. 

The above post is why I have been so reluctant to buy headers in the past.  For one, I just haven't had a great need to go to headers.  Second, all I ever hear is that flange thickness is super important and could cause leaks, tubing gauge is important to reduce unwanted sounds, and collector gaskets blow out all the time.  I don't see why anyone would ever buy headers.  Oh yeah, I didn't even mention what the black ones will look like in 6 months or if you use the ceramic during break in.

But, do people really go around talking about not having problems with things.  Not usually.  So, I have to imagine that there are as many or more people that have great luck with headers.  Headers have been around for years and not all manufacturers have gone out of business.  Also, look at the newer vehicles.  The stock manifolds are looking more like headers every time.

Yes there are definitely pros to headers, but do I really need them.  I still don't know.  And if I can't convince myself, then I guess I will stick with manifolds.


Offline rich weyand

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1391
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #21 on: May 31, 2013, 09:53:47 am »
I have had no problems whatsoever with my Hooker headers in the three years since I bought the truck with them on it.  When the engine was changed out, they put new flange gaskets on, and I have them check the torque on the bolts into the head every oil change.  That's it.

Headers give you, all other things being equal, between 10% and 15% greater horsepower and torque both, according to messing with the Comp Cams dyno simulator program.  That's a big increase for not a lot of money, since the cheap Hooker headers are only $175.
Rich

"Working Girl": 1978 K-10 RCSB 350/TH350/NP203 +2/+3 Tuff Country lift

Offline ehjorten

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #22 on: May 31, 2013, 11:00:21 am »
If you are looking for performance gains then go with headers.  If you don't care...manifolds are probably easier, but not without their headaches!  Our manifolds were designed generally for 2" exhaust pipe.  If you step-up in size there are places that are making 2-1/4" for manifolds.  I think you might even be able to find a 2-1/2" setup.  The issue is...the manifold wasn't designed for that size of pipe.  Generally speaking...they make the exhaust donut flange, but don't put in the section of straight-pipe that the Chevy did to retain the inside of the fiber, donut gasket.  What happens?...the donut gasket fails prematurely and collapses into the inside of the pipe.  Resulting in...A Leak!  >:(  Both Fel-Pro and Mr. Gasket I think make a sintered metal donut gasket that will stand-up better in this situation.

The best luck I have had with manifolds is to make sure that you replace all of the studs with new ones...I usually use Dorman stuff and then also be sure that you use the stock brass nuts!

As for Headers, I have, for myself come up with what I feel is the best setup (again...from my experience)...that is...a header with thick head flanges (1/4" or better) and standard 3-bolt exhaust collectors.  For header gaskets I use the RemFlex gaskets and the Nord-lock locking header bolts.  For collector gaskets I use the thin brass ones, or the dead soft aluminum ones.  If you have thick header flanges and the Remflex gaskets you will probably have to go to the LS length header bolts, because the stock ones will be to short for the thickness of the joint.  The Nord-locks work awesome and you will never have to worry about header bolts loosening again!
« Last Edit: May 31, 2013, 01:33:20 pm by ehjorten »
-Erik-
1991 V3500 - Gen V TBI 454, 4L80E, NP205, 14 bolt FF, D60, 8" Lift on 35s
1977 K20 Silverado - 350, THM350, NP203, 14 bolt FF, D44, Stock Lift on 31s
1969 Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe - EFI350, THM350
1968 Chevrolet Step-side Pickup - 300HP L6

Offline werewolfx13

  • Site Supporters
  • Junior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 841
Re: Headers??? Too many choices
« Reply #23 on: June 01, 2013, 10:41:41 am »
If you're after torque, look at a set of tri-Y headers. Supposedly, the tri-Y design is significantly better for low RPM torque.
Chris
'83 Chevy c10 Silverado SWB
'76 Chevy k20 LWB 6.5'x8' Flatbed
“I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”