Author Topic: Electric Fan Feedback wanted  (Read 14621 times)

Offline Skunksmash

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1398
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2008, 04:14:38 pm »
I would buy one as well. But i wonder... what are the advantages of electric fans instead of belt driven? Free up a little power i guess?

Offline eventhorizon66

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2008, 09:37:57 pm »
When they are on there is little or no advantage, because they convert the drag that would be experienced at the water pump to drag at the alternator (which turns less freely under higher electrical  demand).  The main advantage is when not needed (cruising down the highway) they are off, relieving quite a bit of drag.  Also they take up less space and make working under the hood a little nicer, and little safer (when working around a running engine).
'85 C10 SWB 350 700R4 TKO600

Offline bigkountry

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 453
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2008, 10:40:22 pm »
I like this idea, been wanting to do this for a while.
81 Scottsdale K10 "Under construction"

Offline JJSZABO

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2008, 04:35:59 pm »
I've done it to my Furd Expedition and loved the way it freed up alot of space.  Performance wise (seat of the pants dyno), I didn't "feel" a difference.
Jeff

86 Chevy C-10
350, TH400
Ex father and son project (son lost interest)

Son regained interest when truck was almost completed

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19181
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2008, 06:54:41 pm »
I've done it to my Furd Expedition and loved the way it freed up alot of space.  Performance wise (seat of the pants dyno), I didn't "feel" a difference.

Really? I  notice a huge difference without that mechanical fan pulling on the crankshaft. Throttle response is where I always "feel" the difference.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline 86 chevy silverado

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 212
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2008, 07:38:21 pm »
You stand to gain as much as 25+ hp on performance motors by losing the belt driven fan. Drag from the alternator I don't feel would be significant enough to to call a con. Take it the next step and put an underdrive pulley set up also good for up to another 5hp on the up side.

Offline JJSZABO

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #21 on: September 15, 2008, 07:17:52 am »
I've done it to my Furd Expedition and loved the way it freed up alot of space.  Performance wise (seat of the pants dyno), I didn't "feel" a difference.

Really? I  notice a huge difference without that mechanical fan pulling on the crankshaft. Throttle response is where I always "feel" the difference.

No, no difference.  I felt the "most" difference with the custom program chip I installed.  Throttle difference was night and day compared to the stock programming.  I had to put in 93 octane to get the most benifit - started to get VERY expensive.  I was going to do underdrive pulley set before I decided to get rid of it for a 3/4 ton Suburban with an 8.1 liter.  I have plenty of pulling power now - and at the same fuel usage as the Furd.
Jeff

86 Chevy C-10
350, TH400
Ex father and son project (son lost interest)

Son regained interest when truck was almost completed

Offline Skunksmash

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1398
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2008, 03:39:39 am »
So uh... yall working on designing us a drop in electric fan setup yet? ;D

Offline Captkaos

  • OWNER and Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18461
    • http://www.73-87chevytrucks.com
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2008, 10:41:31 am »
I don't think we got all the specs yet, but I plan on working on one soon.

Offline team39763

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1194
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2008, 08:35:40 pm »
I didn't feel a difference when I added my e-fans to my 2000 GMC.  I now have those same fans on my '82.  Another guy in town has the same exact fans(from a 2002 silverado) on his '81.

Offline CruzinHigh

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 197
  • Chevy 4 life
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #25 on: September 27, 2008, 09:43:06 pm »
It sounds like you're already sold on buying brand new parts Chris, but why not consider a cheap-o junkyard parts option?  I robbed the twin fans out of my IROC and just threw in the exact relay setup and everything from straight out of the Camaro.   

There's a bunch of options for just stealing the parts outta any old grocery grabber or whatever for sure.  I can say that adding the fans from the Camaro was super easy and very minimal fabrication was required.

In fact, I am not even running a shroud at all on mine!  If you're wanting the shroud for safety sake, now that's another thing.  But I don't even need the shroud for cooling purposes.  The twin fans suck hard enough to keep a shop rag sucked to the front grille and even with a stock radiator I never see much hotter than 210 deg. when idling in traffic in summer.
Mike Carter
1986 Chevy K-10 4x4

8" lift project on the way soon!

Offline Captkaos

  • OWNER and Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18461
    • http://www.73-87chevytrucks.com
Re: Electric Fan Feedback wanted
« Reply #26 on: September 27, 2008, 10:50:13 pm »
I will be adding alot of heat to the motor with 2 turbo's and the one I purchased is rated at 5900CFM, it has no shroud either.