Author Topic: Rear gear ratio for mileage  (Read 5853 times)

Offline Enginerd

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
Rear gear ratio for mileage
« on: March 01, 2013, 04:34:46 pm »
Hi guys,

I have a 1978 C-10 with a 350 SBC, SM465 tranny, and 3.73 geared 12-bolt.  Would swapping to a 3.08 rear gear (or numerically lower) help my mileage much?

Thanks,
Gary

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2013, 05:18:43 pm »
If you do mostly highway driving yes, but otherwise probably not.  What is your current usage and mpg?
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2013, 12:50:43 am »
i think so---for highway cruising.  And it would likely improve more with 2.73.

Might be cheaper/easier to go with taller tires.

Offline Enginerd

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 6
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2013, 01:11:58 pm »
If you do mostly highway driving yes, but otherwise probably not.  What is your current usage and mpg?
I live in a rural area where most of the drive time is used to get to town, and then just a short distance through a small town.  I'm not sure what the current mpg is since my odometer is not working

I think so---for highway cruising.  And it would likely improve more with 2.73.  Might be cheaper/easier to go with taller tires.
I'd really like a set of 2.73 gears, but I cant buy 2-series gears new.  I'd also be happy with a set of 3.08 gears, which I can buy new, but I think I need a different carrier to use them, wouldn't I?  As for tires, I just bought all new stock size tires for the factory rims, so I don't want to get new rears again. 

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2013, 01:36:21 pm »
I would trade you in a heartbeat if you were anywhere close to NW Indiana.  3.73 is a perfect gear using a OD.  IMO your best bet would be to find a whole rear end and swap it out.
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline travisr1988

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 283
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2013, 09:10:14 pm »
Wouldn't taller tires just throw off your odometer and speedometer? which really wouldn't help your mileage, it'd just make you think it is, a narrower tire will help a little, but I don't think a taller tire would help. Anyone care to explain the taller tire theory?
1979 Chevrolet Silverado C20 rclb cammed 355/th400/4.10 - sold
1977 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe c10 rcsb stepside 355/th350/3.42
Vortec heads lunati cam edelbrock intake headers

Offline Tx_Phil

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • Newbie
Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2013, 11:14:25 pm »
Taller tires equate to a numerically lower final drive ratio. The taller the tire the fewer times it needs to turn to cover the same distance as a short tire. This results in fewer RPMs and less fuel consumed.

The trade off is that you now have a longer lever arm thus taking more energy to get the tire turning. In this case taller tires cost you more gas.

If you drive 50/50 hwy/city taller tires will typically burn more gas. If you drive 75% hwy then they can save you a little gas.


Offline travisr1988

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 283
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2013, 02:50:33 pm »
That makes sense. Thank you for the explaination Tx_Phil
1979 Chevrolet Silverado C20 rclb cammed 355/th400/4.10 - sold
1977 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe c10 rcsb stepside 355/th350/3.42
Vortec heads lunati cam edelbrock intake headers

Offline Tx_Phil

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • Newbie
Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2013, 07:01:07 pm »
Glad I could pitch in.

I'm a computer geek more or less so my wrenching skill aren't really good enough to help out around here. When I do stumble across something I know the answer to I try to help.

Offline Blazin

  • Blazin new trails!
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6130
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2013, 07:31:31 am »
Based on what you explained as your driving habits in my opinion it would take you a long time to pay yourself back with the next to nothing increase in MPGs you will see of the cost of swapping gears, or even the whole axle.
Some people are like Slinkies. Not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs

Offline Boone83K10

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 159
Re: Rear gear ratio for mileage
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2013, 10:30:21 am »
I have the same type of driving you have, except mine is in the mountains of NC. I have 3.08 auto hub 10 bolts with 700r4... I am only getting 7 mpg (average). I don't think the swap would be worth it.
1966 Mercury Comet - Built 429 (First Car/Show Car)
1983 Chevrolet K10 - Built 350 (Winter Toy)
1992 Chevrolet Lumina Euro (Sold @ 265,000 miles)
2003 Ford Escape 4x4 - Mac Perf. Intake/Exhaust (Wifes' DD)
2007 Mercury Milan - Steeda Tuned (Summer Toy)