Author Topic: exhaust question (not the usual)  (Read 6207 times)

Offline 4x4orbust

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 342
exhaust question (not the usual)
« on: January 18, 2009, 08:29:50 pm »
so i went out plowing today with the 82, (K10 350/th350)  and all was going well, untill the truck started sounding like a monster truck.  turns out, the exhaust fell off.   quite literally, it fell off both the drivers side and passenger side right at the manifolds.   actually right after the manifolds (at the flange for the y-pipe)  i crawled up under there and tried to figure something out, and proceeded to tear the old rusty peices out.

seeing as i was out plowing, i didnt have much time to do a proper repair, but here's what i did.  i had  a couple of 2 1/4" to 1 7/8" reducers, which i flared down on the 1 7/8 side to fit into the manifold end, grabbed a 4 lb sledge, and kinda squeezed them into the manifold exit end. connected to the exhaust with some flexible exhaust pipe,  fired the truck back up and finished the plow route.   

for the rest of the route, i fealt as though the truck had considerably less power (yes there  were a couple leaks around the "fix").      I pulled one side back off when i got home, and the end of the adapter was at 1 1/2 inches.  (basically there was a 1.5" exhaust pipe right after the manifold)  i am assuming the other side is the same, they are run as true duals.

 what are the consequences of running the truck like that? other than the loss of power, would it harm any engine internals because the exhaust is restricted?

oh, and i am planning on upgrading from the stock manifolds to long tubes in the spring, soon as the weather warms up, so the truck may run like it is til the end of winter, hence the questions on harming the engine.

thanks for the help!!

phil
« Last Edit: January 19, 2009, 07:39:28 am by 4x4orbust »
1982 chevy K-10 SWB, 355 th350/np208. 2.5"lift, 33" swampers, headers/duals,  current project

Offline 4x4orbust

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 342
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2009, 08:49:45 am »
anyone? i just don't want to hurt the engine, it only has 3k miles on it
1982 chevy K-10 SWB, 355 th350/np208. 2.5"lift, 33" swampers, headers/duals,  current project

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2009, 09:03:02 am »
IMO if it still runs good and doesn't miss you probably are OK.  I wouldn't run it like it is though.
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline 78 Chevyrado

  • Z62 ON-ROAD
  • Site Supporters
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2748
    • My Photobucket Site
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2009, 09:34:40 am »
Never run one without manifolds or you'll burn an exhaust valve.  I'd say as long as there is still some pipe after the manifolds, it'll be ok.  If you can see fire coming out or light at the end of the pipe/manifold, you need more pipe, or you may burn a valve.  You lost power because there's no scavenging now with no exhaust. 
« Last Edit: January 20, 2009, 09:37:52 am by 78 Chevyrado »
Kenny

1978 C-20, 350/400, 3.73, Graystone Metallic, Raceline Renegade 8 Wheels - 18x8.5, 275/70R18 BFG KO's

Offline ccz145a

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1393
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2009, 09:58:34 am »
Just a thought about valve damage: I always thought open exaust was a bad idea because the exaust side would cool down too fast after the engine is shut off, causing the valves to warp, then burn at the resulting bad seat.
1975 C10 Silverado LWB, 454CID, TH400, 10bolt 3.42
11MPG Downhill w/tailwind (but there ain't no hills here)

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19182
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2009, 10:36:41 am »
Throw some stainless headers on it and run dual exhaust.

Realistically it won't cause any imediate damage but now you have an excuse to redo your exhaust. If you are plowing with it and it's still obnoxious you'll probably lose customers.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline 4x4orbust

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 342
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2009, 08:13:03 pm »
thanks for the replies.   the exhaust is still hooked up to the manifolds, it's just really, really jimmy rigged, but it still flows through the flowmaster 40's so it's not obnoxious, just annoying.... ;D j/k   

i have been looking at some headers  today and the most i have come across is on summit.   i  was wondering if anyone has used the summit cheapo headers before and what their opinion is on them...  as a contractor, money is not plentiful right now, so i was looking at the 90 dollar headers as a temporary add-on till times get better and i can get some ceramic coated ones...
also, when i put headers on a carbed truck, do you have to adjust the carb at all??
1982 chevy K-10 SWB, 355 th350/np208. 2.5"lift, 33" swampers, headers/duals,  current project

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19182
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2009, 10:20:33 am »
I just put another set of the 88-95 shorties on my mutt project. They are very cost effective and fit nice. You just have to grind one small area of the drivers upper frame rail to fit them. If you want pix I can take some.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline 4x4orbust

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 342
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2009, 05:09:39 pm »
would i be better off with shorties?  i was looking into long tube headers,  mainly because i was under the impression that shorties are not much better than stock manifolds.   what are the advantages/disadvantages of shortie's vs longtubes?
1982 chevy K-10 SWB, 355 th350/np208. 2.5"lift, 33" swampers, headers/duals,  current project

Offline oldwhity

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1037
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2009, 07:26:20 pm »
I don't know what the advantages or disadvantages are but I bought a set on the $90-$100 Flowtech long tubes from Summit or Jegs(can't remember). Install(about a year ago) was easy and still no leaks(about 300 miles).
Rob G.
81 Chevy K20 4x4 LWB stepside
I enjoy long quiet walks..........in a junkyard!

Offline Blazin

  • Blazin new trails!
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6130
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2009, 09:20:52 pm »
I have run long tubes in the past on plow trucks. They tend to get masshed by the front drive shaft because of the extra weight on the front end with the plow. My 86  K 30 I am currently running with a slight lift, big block, and 9' plow has this problem. I plan on replacing the headers with shorty / block hugger type if I can find some that fit. As far as difference in performance, if any it would be so minimal??
Some people are like Slinkies. Not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs

Offline Dragon

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 642
Re: exhaust question (not the usual)
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2009, 02:13:14 pm »
I just put another set of the 88-95 shorties on my mutt project. They are very cost effective and fit nice. You just have to grind one small area of the drivers upper frame rail to fit them. If you want pix I can take some.

Oh! oh! oh! oh! oh! PIX PL3AS3 ;D
Dragon
08 Magnum-New Toy
96 Caprice 9C1-Who Knows
96 GMC ECLWB & 92 Chevy ECLWB
77 GMC K25 HS-Gone but Not Forgotten