1
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Registration and Posting Agreement
Home
Forum
Store
Help
Search
Gallery
Login
Register
73-87chevytrucks.com
»
73-87 Chevy _ GMC Trucks
»
Performance
»
Turbo vs. No Turbo
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
Author
Topic: Turbo vs. No Turbo (Read 8553 times)
LTZ C20
Senior Member
Posts: 3795
"I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
on:
December 23, 2011, 11:47:47 am »
I have a 79' Standard Cab Long bed Cheyenne C20, with it a SB350 and a Turbo350 tranny. I had this thought, hoping ya'll could help me with it. What will adding a turbocharger do to my SMOG here in California, will I get better mileage, is it worth it, what kinda of power gain could I expect with one. Those kinds o things. Thanks ya'll.
Logged
LTZ Cheyenne C20
beastie_3
Senior Member
Posts: 3170
Josh
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #1 on:
December 24, 2011, 12:50:53 am »
Im not sure on the smog requirements, but I wouldnt think it would be a problem. The issue you will run into is the expense of it.
Logged
79 K10
Semper Fi
73-87 Chevy Trucks Facebook Page
bake74
Senior Member
Posts: 5871
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #2 on:
December 24, 2011, 06:25:01 am »
They do make turbo's that are smog legal for CA. Not all are, so be carefull.
As far as mileage, it would get better mileage if you kept your foot out of the pedal, but that is not the reason people put turbo's in, if that is the case why spend the money. So your mileage will go down because you will want to use the power.
The other issue is the engine, people dont put turbo's on stock engines and expect them to last long. You can get 100 - 200 hp out of turbo's, more if they are good ones.
Once again as Beastie said, the expense, will it be worth it to you ?
Logged
#1: The easiest and most obvious solution to any problem is 99% of the time correct.
#2: There is no such thing as impossible, it just takes longer.
74 k10, 77k10 Tom
1978 454 Big 10
Registered Users
Posts: 101
Don't Mess With Texas! :)
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #3 on:
December 24, 2011, 06:30:14 am »
Supercharger would be MUCH easier to install!
Logged
1978 Chevy C-10 Silverado "Big 10" 454, 400 turbo, PW, PDL, Tilt, Cruise, AM/FM, Factory Tach, Dual Tanks, Locking Diff, Sliding Rear Window, Trans Cooler, Cordova Brown/Santa Fe Tan. 052,600 Original miles!
LTZ C20
Senior Member
Posts: 3795
"I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #4 on:
December 24, 2011, 11:29:21 am »
I am really light on the peddle anyway, I don't have a lot of money so I conserve my gas, the top end of my engine has been rebuilt and I have and Edelbrock carb and intake. Right now I have about 230-245 horse and I would like a little more. I have a friend who has turbos just laying around so he said he would give me one. Hopefully one is smog legal. I just wanted a little extra go go when I need it.
Logged
LTZ Cheyenne C20
Captkaos
OWNER and Administrator
Administrator
Senior Member
Posts: 18461
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #5 on:
December 24, 2011, 12:54:33 pm »
If he has turbo's laying around, it isn't the actual turbo that is emissions legal or not, it is the system for the truck, and there isn't on for gasoline motors. You would have to build it, and then have it inspected.
Logged
Chris Lucas
73-87chevytrucks
captkaoscustoms
squarebody
LTZ C20
Senior Member
Posts: 3795
"I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #6 on:
December 24, 2011, 08:17:32 pm »
Oh see, I did not know that. Well he definitely has the ability to build a system for it. I don't know what to do about the inspection though.
Logged
LTZ Cheyenne C20
bake74
Senior Member
Posts: 5871
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #7 on:
December 24, 2011, 09:21:22 pm »
If your truck is 75 or older in Cal. no inspection is required as long as you do not let your registration and insurance run out, or you put in in non-op. The 74 step side k10 I bought, I went to register it cause it was on a non-op, went to dmv, lady said this much, I said don't you have to inspect it ? her answer to me was " now why would I want to do that "
Logged
#1: The easiest and most obvious solution to any problem is 99% of the time correct.
#2: There is no such thing as impossible, it just takes longer.
74 k10, 77k10 Tom
LTZ C20
Senior Member
Posts: 3795
"I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #8 on:
December 24, 2011, 10:11:19 pm »
Well the truck is a 79. What will that do to trying to get it passed?
Logged
LTZ Cheyenne C20
bake74
Senior Member
Posts: 5871
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #9 on:
December 25, 2011, 05:35:59 am »
Since it is a 79 it will have to be inspected and smogged if you add a turbo. NOt impossible, but you should do all your homework first so you know what they expect.
Logged
#1: The easiest and most obvious solution to any problem is 99% of the time correct.
#2: There is no such thing as impossible, it just takes longer.
74 k10, 77k10 Tom
LTZ C20
Senior Member
Posts: 3795
"I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #10 on:
December 25, 2011, 01:08:10 pm »
Awesome, good idea. Ya'll don't know where I could find that information do you?
Logged
LTZ Cheyenne C20
bake74
Senior Member
Posts: 5871
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #11 on:
December 25, 2011, 04:58:29 pm »
If it was me, I would go into a shop that does smog and start asking questions, it might take you a couple of tries to find a shop that will answer your questions, but you can find one. I have done this in the past with other vehicles, and it saves a lot of money and headaches to know in advance.
Logged
#1: The easiest and most obvious solution to any problem is 99% of the time correct.
#2: There is no such thing as impossible, it just takes longer.
74 k10, 77k10 Tom
LTZ C20
Senior Member
Posts: 3795
"I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #12 on:
December 25, 2011, 08:11:40 pm »
OK great. I will work on that in the next week or so.
Logged
LTZ Cheyenne C20
frotosride
Senior Member
Posts: 1428
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #13 on:
December 27, 2011, 10:51:34 pm »
Being a power junky I vote turbo...then again my state doesn't require emission inspects (YET). I have the same plans for the future of 'old blue' and the 383 strkr im building so please post pic and updates if you decide to do this one.
Logged
"Beat it like a red-headed ford"
1987 v10 Silverado(LQ4), 87 R10,83 K20, 83 cucv 6.2 Detroit
2006 Boulevard M109R 109 cid,2019 M109R BOSS
2009 Jeep XK, (future LS Swap)
GSXR 750 engine awaiting go kart
LTZ C20
Senior Member
Posts: 3795
"I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Re: Turbo vs. No Turbo
«
Reply #14 on:
December 27, 2011, 11:08:41 pm »
Haha, well I am also a bit of a power hog. I do however live in a state that has twisted, disgusting, and social inappropriate smog regulations. If it's toward my benefit, I will do it. And I will post pics if I do. California, nice place. California road laws, TOTAL DUMP!
Logged
LTZ Cheyenne C20
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
« previous
next »
73-87chevytrucks.com
»
73-87 Chevy _ GMC Trucks
»
Performance
»
Turbo vs. No Turbo