Author Topic: 2000 GMC Sonoma automatic transmission question???  (Read 2613 times)

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
2000 GMC Sonoma automatic transmission question???
« on: May 30, 2013, 10:51:57 pm »
I borrowed my Dad's truck to go to Menard's.  It has the 4.3L automatic.  This is the first time I had really driven it and noticed it really wanted to coast as in no engine braking, very similar to just putting it in neutral with no slowing down and actually picking up speed going down hill.  Is this common thing to happen on these trucks?  The throttle was not sticking or anything like that as I put it in neutral and the rpms dropped all the way to 700 on the tach.  The transmission shifts perfectly and even though it has 151K on it the truck runs and drives like it is new.  The only complaint is that it seems that more brake is needed to stop than it should be.  Dropping it to 3rd has all the engine brake as you would expect.  Could the lockup converter just be in free-wheel mode in OD?  Just curious if some one knows?
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline Tx_Phil

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • Newbie
2000 GMC Sonoma automatic transmission question???
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2013, 11:08:04 pm »
I'm no expert on transmissions but I think what you are experiencing is by design. I have a 99 silverado 1500 regular cab 2wd with the 4.3 v6 and 4 speed automatic. It will coast like you are describing, maybe more so. I've let it coast in OD at 60mph and it drops pretty quick until about 45mph. At 45 I've been able to coast over a mile and only lose about 5mph.

Using that coasting and driving smart I can get over 22mpg from that truck. It's kind of crazy to get that mileage but it works. So what if the Houston maniacs don't like it !!
« Last Edit: May 30, 2013, 11:10:17 pm by Tx_Phil »

Offline Irish_Alley

  • Tim
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13333
  • Family is not an important thing. It's everything.
Re: 2000 GMC Sonoma automatic transmission question???
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2013, 11:17:26 pm »
my 04 impala will do the same thing. i think it was designed like that for better millage but thats just me thinking also kind of like phil was talking about
If you can’t tell yourself the truth, who can you tell it to?~Irish_Alley

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth ~Sherlock Holmes

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: 2000 GMC Sonoma automatic transmission question???
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2013, 07:37:30 am »
Thanks, I was hoping it was supposed to be like that.  At least I told dad that nothing was wrong and that it was a gas mileage thing
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline blazing816

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 391
  • A Truck Is Built, Not Bought
Re: 2000 GMC Sonoma automatic transmission question???
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2013, 03:08:12 pm »
I had a 98 Chevy S10 Blazer an it did the same thing when I was in OD. It is by design for the MPG, I did mostly backroads driving at 50mph and I use to get like 25-26mpg out of that thing and it was not rated that high as it was 4x4 also. I thought it was great, but it was a little different at first and threw me off a little too.
-----------------------------
1988 Chevy R20 Scottsdale Crew Cab (350/TH400/4.56)