All Classified forums require a Site Supporter subscription. It is only $25 per year and you can buy and sell whatever you like on the forum. To become a Site Supporter, go to Your Profile and select "Paid Subscriptions."
Quote from: LTZ C20 on May 02, 2016, 10:26:14 pmQuote from: roundhouse on May 02, 2016, 09:57:58 pmNo way I'd buy a new Chevy I have a 07 3/4 ton 4wd as a company truck and it's the roughest riding pickup I've have ever driven Just as bad as my 77 K-10 And worse than most all of my 18 wheelers And it rattles and squeaks , transmission shifts horribly Clanks and clunks , takes almost 3 seconds to go into gear when you drop it into drive The Tundra I had before that , wow. Now that was a nice truck Rode like a car Trans was smooth as silk No squeaks or rattles Light years better than ford or GM Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf you're having those kinds of issues, you have something wrong with the truck. I've driven tons of newer trucks, both personal and company vehicles, they only have issues when they aren't cared for. The brand new trucks ride and run amazingly smooth.I assume the $65K ones ride nice. This is the plastic seat rubber floor can't adjust the mirrors work truck But it's still a total POSWhatever corners Chevy cut to make it a cheap work truck would keep me from ever buying a Chevy pickup of any kind Fortunately this one belongs to my employer I'm gonna try to remove some leafs from the springs and get them to swap the tires Hopefully the company will buy a new one before too long and maybe I can talk them into a tundra instead of a Chevy I haven't sen any indication that it has not been maintained ,I do t see how skipping maintenance could make it ride worse than a dumptruckThat's just crap design or GM slapping on really stiff springs to call it a 3/4 ton I suppose It ride like my dads leaf spring jeep wrangler Plus all the squeaks and rattles are just typical big three poor quality They can brag all they want about how high quality their new vehicles are Of course they are. All brand new vehicles are niceThe real quality test is when it's ten years old and has 170K miles on it
Quote from: roundhouse on May 02, 2016, 09:57:58 pmNo way I'd buy a new Chevy I have a 07 3/4 ton 4wd as a company truck and it's the roughest riding pickup I've have ever driven Just as bad as my 77 K-10 And worse than most all of my 18 wheelers And it rattles and squeaks , transmission shifts horribly Clanks and clunks , takes almost 3 seconds to go into gear when you drop it into drive The Tundra I had before that , wow. Now that was a nice truck Rode like a car Trans was smooth as silk No squeaks or rattles Light years better than ford or GM Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf you're having those kinds of issues, you have something wrong with the truck. I've driven tons of newer trucks, both personal and company vehicles, they only have issues when they aren't cared for. The brand new trucks ride and run amazingly smooth.
No way I'd buy a new Chevy I have a 07 3/4 ton 4wd as a company truck and it's the roughest riding pickup I've have ever driven Just as bad as my 77 K-10 And worse than most all of my 18 wheelers And it rattles and squeaks , transmission shifts horribly Clanks and clunks , takes almost 3 seconds to go into gear when you drop it into drive The Tundra I had before that , wow. Now that was a nice truck Rode like a car Trans was smooth as silk No squeaks or rattles Light years better than ford or GM Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: philo_beddoe on May 03, 2016, 10:14:06 amQuote from: LTZ C20 on May 02, 2016, 10:17:25 pmQuote from: philo_beddoe on May 02, 2016, 02:43:07 pmYou mean you would pass up a 1967 Shelby GT500?And I wouldn't even regret it one bit.Why would you pass up a million dollar american classic muscle car? Wait, is it a Cali thing? LolI didn't want one when they were worn out worthless gas guzzlers and don't want one now Most people only want cars because everyone else wants it My fave is a 66 Thunderbird town coupe or town landau They have never been worth much and won't ever be worth much But Ive owned 5 and will buy another one one of these days I've regretted selling every old car I've ever had Not because they are valuable and desirable now But because I thought they were cool then and only sold em to fund the next one I've had a 70 Trans am cost me $1200 in 1992A 69 Mercury cyclone cake Yarbrough edition $275 in 1981A 66 thunderbird 428 $600 in '1980A 69 thunderbird 4 door 429. $400 in 1981Etc etcNever cared much for mustangs
Quote from: LTZ C20 on May 02, 2016, 10:17:25 pmQuote from: philo_beddoe on May 02, 2016, 02:43:07 pmYou mean you would pass up a 1967 Shelby GT500?And I wouldn't even regret it one bit.Why would you pass up a million dollar american classic muscle car? Wait, is it a Cali thing? Lol
Quote from: philo_beddoe on May 02, 2016, 02:43:07 pmYou mean you would pass up a 1967 Shelby GT500?And I wouldn't even regret it one bit.
You mean you would pass up a 1967 Shelby GT500?
Yup nafta, worst bill ever signed into law.
Wouldn't trade my square away buuuuuuuut, that doesn't mean I can't like others. I could be wrong tho I haven't seen a motorcraft part with the word China on it the package. No government bail out for Ford either.Otherwise I'm ok with all three at least with the older vehicles spells American.
Ok LTZ, at least your honest, i'll respect that. Regarding fords, that is. And roundhouse, you are correct. Of course they should be perfect when they are brand new, but 10 yrs down the road is what matters. Oh yeah, i take the prize for being the stupid one and selling a car i should have kept. Are you ready,,,,70 chevelle LS 6. Beat that. Edit: but in 1985, they were everywhere.
Quote from: blazer74 on May 02, 2016, 05:31:13 pmWouldn't trade my square away buuuuuuuut, that doesn't mean I can't like others. I could be wrong tho I haven't seen a motorcraft part with the word China on it the package. No government bail out for Ford either.Otherwise I'm ok with all three at least with the older vehicles spells American.Are you sure about that?Read these and decide if Ford was able to live without your hard earned tax dollars:5.9billion from Uncle Sugar:http://www.foxnews.com/story/2009/06/23/ford-gets-5-billion-government-loan.htmlThis is the cute one. 7billion taxpayer dollars the article calls "black ops" so that Ford can fly under the radar of websites like the one we are on:http://www.foxnews.com/story/2009/06/23/ford-gets-5-billion-government-loan.htmlYou'll like this one from Forbes back in 2012:http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2012/08/29/automakers-report-card-who-still-owes-taxpayers-money-the-answer-might-surprise-you/#771406ad6a8cFactcheck.org:http://www.factcheck.org/2011/09/ford-motor-co-does-u-turn-on-bailouts/Take a gander at this one:http://www.chevyhardcore.com/news/editorial-did-ford-take-bailout-money-too-yes-they-did/There used to be an awesome WSJ article however I can no longer find it. But you get the picture.