Author Topic: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............  (Read 12634 times)

Offline Dr_Snooz

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 684
  • "I like to take hammers, and just break stuff"
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #15 on: July 30, 2016, 11:20:02 pm »
The writing in that article is really good. The author is really talented.

The car is ghastly.
1989 Chevy Suburban V-2500, 5.7L, TH400

1990 Chevy C-3500 Ext. Cab, 7.4L, 3L80

2009 Chevy Silverado 1500 WT 4WD, 4.8L, 4L60

Offline hatzie

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #16 on: July 31, 2016, 01:50:37 pm »
Two each is own.  I think I threw up a little in my mouth...  I think I would rather drive an AMC Gremlin or Pacer...
The Gremlins were actually kinda cool
My mom had a 67 beetle and then a 73 Gremlin and then a 80 chevette

With the chevette  and the Cadillac version of the Chevy cavalier
And GM still wonders why Honda and Toyota kicked their butts


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had a Gremlin X with the mighty mighty 401 AMC.  Heckuva sleeper.
If they had used the Javelin as the base for the Gremlin instead of the Hornet it would've been a pretty cool looking car.
This is the Javelin based AMX-GT concept from the 1968 NY auto show. It'd be cool to find if it survived. http://gremlinx.com/a-brief-history-of-the-amc-gremlin/
SVC & wiring mans --> Here http://tinyurl.com/7387BRD-SVCMAN or My Bucket @ http://tinyurl.com/SQ-SVCMAN
Parts & Illustr Books -->http://tinyurl.com/SqParts
GMSTG Textbooks-->http://tinyurl.com/STG-TEXTBK
Radio Manuals-->http://tinyurl.com/DELCORADSVC

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #17 on: August 01, 2016, 08:10:34 pm »
Two each is own.  I think I threw up a little in my mouth...  I think I would rather drive an AMC Gremlin or Pacer...
The Gremlins were actually kinda cool
My mom had a 67 beetle and then a 73 Gremlin and then a 80 chevette

With the chevette  and the Cadillac version of the Chevy cavalier
And GM still wonders why Honda and Toyota kicked their butts

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i'm sorry  but i think the chevette is/was a good car except for being underpowered, which can be remedied, and cramped due the trans protruding into the cabin, which can't really be remedied. 

Offline roundhouse

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Newbie
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2016, 07:02:52 am »
Two each is own.  I think I threw up a little in my mouth...  I think I would rather drive an AMC Gremlin or Pacer...
The Gremlins were actually kinda cool
My mom had a 67 beetle and then a 73 Gremlin and then a 80 chevette

With the chevette  and the Cadillac version of the Chevy cavalier
And GM still wonders why Honda and Toyota kicked their butts

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i'm sorry  but i think the chevette is/was a good car except for being underpowered, which can be remedied, and cramped due the trans protruding into the cabin, which can't really be remedied.
A Toyota celica used less gas , was lighter,  faster and far more reliable
Plus held its value , something Big three vehicles are not familiar with

I had a 77 and an 80 celica
Fantastic cars


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline hatzie

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #19 on: August 02, 2016, 06:59:20 pm »
Two each is own.  I think I threw up a little in my mouth...  I think I would rather drive an AMC Gremlin or Pacer...
The Gremlins were actually kinda cool
My mom had a 67 beetle and then a 73 Gremlin and then a 80 chevette

With the chevette  and the Cadillac version of the Chevy cavalier
And GM still wonders why Honda and Toyota kicked their butts

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i'm sorry  but i think the chevette is/was a good car except for being underpowered, which can be remedied, and cramped due the trans protruding into the cabin, which can't really be remedied.
A Toyota celica used less gas , was lighter,  faster and far more reliable
Plus held its value , something Big three vehicles are not familiar with

I had a 77 and an 80 celica
Fantastic cars


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I gotta agree on that.  Toyota was always very reliable.  The Celica beat the big four and the Datsun Z car in reliability and it was pretty quick.

Sent from my SM-P605V using Tapatalk

SVC & wiring mans --> Here http://tinyurl.com/7387BRD-SVCMAN or My Bucket @ http://tinyurl.com/SQ-SVCMAN
Parts & Illustr Books -->http://tinyurl.com/SqParts
GMSTG Textbooks-->http://tinyurl.com/STG-TEXTBK
Radio Manuals-->http://tinyurl.com/DELCORADSVC

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2016, 11:40:46 pm »
Two each is own.  I think I threw up a little in my mouth...  I think I would rather drive an AMC Gremlin or Pacer...
The Gremlins were actually kinda cool
My mom had a 67 beetle and then a 73 Gremlin and then a 80 chevette

With the chevette  and the Cadillac version of the Chevy cavalier
And GM still wonders why Honda and Toyota kicked their butts

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i'm sorry  but i think the chevette is/was a good car except for being underpowered, which can be remedied, and cramped due the trans protruding into the cabin, which can't really be remedied.
A Toyota celica used less gas , was lighter,  faster and far more reliable
Plus held its value , something Big three vehicles are not familiar with

I had a 77 and an 80 celica
Fantastic cars


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


To sleepy to get into it now, but wanted to respond so i wouldn't forget about it.

i want specs.   How much better mpg?   What celica got over 59mpg?  i'm not too concerned about weight right now.  As far as faster, yes MOST cars were are faster than a chevette.  i'm not concerned about that either right now.

Offline hatzie

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #21 on: August 03, 2016, 07:51:37 pm »
My 1978 47hp 1.5L VW diesel got 55mpg. 

No Chevette even came close to 59mpg.  The 1.8L 51hp Isuzu diesel got 34/40 City/Hwy. 
They're in the same ballpark but the Chevette is less.  The 52hp 1.4L Chevette got EPA 28mpg hwy.  The 117hp 2.0L Celica GT got EPA 32mpg hwy.
SVC & wiring mans --> Here http://tinyurl.com/7387BRD-SVCMAN or My Bucket @ http://tinyurl.com/SQ-SVCMAN
Parts & Illustr Books -->http://tinyurl.com/SqParts
GMSTG Textbooks-->http://tinyurl.com/STG-TEXTBK
Radio Manuals-->http://tinyurl.com/DELCORADSVC

Offline LTZ C20

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3795
  • "I'm here for a good time" -George Strait
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #22 on: August 04, 2016, 11:34:50 pm »
I've driven multiple Chevy Cruze's with GM's  2.0L EcoTec turbo diesel and repeatedly achieved 60-65 mpg. The best I ever got was 66 mpg on a 20 mile straight drive. I think I remember hearing rumors that if you filled up and jumped on the freeway and just drove you could get 700 miles out of a single tank. Never heard if this was true tho. I love them, if I was looking to buy that vehicle specifically, I would only get the turbo diesel. Only down side is the DEF fluid, we won't get into that tho.
LTZ Cheyenne C20

Offline roundhouse

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Newbie
Re: When you try to combine monte carlo and chevette.............
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2016, 08:50:00 am »
Two each is own.  I think I threw up a little in my mouth...  I think I would rather drive an AMC Gremlin or Pacer...
The Gremlins were actually kinda cool
My mom had a 67 beetle and then a 73 Gremlin and then a 80 chevette

With the chevette  and the Cadillac version of the Chevy cavalier
And GM still wonders why Honda and Toyota kicked their butts

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i'm sorry  but i think the chevette is/was a good car except for being underpowered, which can be remedied, and cramped due the trans protruding into the cabin, which can't really be remedied.
A Toyota celica used less gas , was lighter,  faster and far more reliable
Plus held its value , something Big three vehicles are not familiar with

I had a 77 and an 80 celica
Fantastic cars


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


To sleepy to get into it now, but wanted to respond so i wouldn't forget about it.

i want specs.   How much better mpg?   What celica got over 59mpg?  i'm not too concerned about weight right now.  As far as faster, yes MOST cars were are faster than a chevette.  i'm not concerned about that either right now.
I doubt a Chevette diesel averaged 59 but I dunno
Mine was a gas burner and I don't Remember what it got exactly
The Celtics was a heck of a lot more fun to drive and faster and handled far better and unlike a Chevy , never broke down .

I ditched the Celica for a 71 Trans-am


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk