Author Topic: 96- heads  (Read 5084 times)

Offline mikewb

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 167
96- heads
« on: April 11, 2008, 04:26:11 pm »
i heard something about the 96-up heads needing more backpressure to run there best. anybody know about that?

Offline HAULIN IT

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: 96- heads
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2008, 09:06:03 am »
Mike, The whole "needs back pressure" is bunk! NO 4 cycle engine needs back pressure for optimum power, scavenging yes, back pressure NO. They will operate best with no exhaust leaks & some length of pipe past the exhaust port, but no back pressure. The amount of pipe is the key, go to the demolition derby & see "the guy" with the 8 single stacks up through the hood, it looks cool, but pops, ect. & truly is down on power compared to one with a 4-into -1 collected exhaust header/manifold. What your ultimately looking for is less than a few PSI of back pressure at WOT, measured before the muffler. When you have achieved this, "uncapping" the exhaust becomes near worthless. The reason drag race (& others) vehicles run "uncapped" is because this eliminates much the back pressure (bends/mufflers), however, quite often, a given amount of straight pipe is needed past the merge point of the header tubes for best results, so sometimes it's possible to GAIN power with an exhaust hooked up vs. just open headers (no collector extension) because this particular exhaust isn't restrictive for the power output, but likes to "see" a foot or so of pipe past the merge point or a H or X pipe is in place, but is gone with the open headers. Where's myth buster's when you need them? Isn't some of that show a riot? Lorne

Offline team39763

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1194
Re: 96- heads
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2008, 07:58:19 pm »
I would love to see this one on mythbusters.

Offline SUX2BU99

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1478
    • My Cardomain Site. Truck is on Page 6.
Re: 96- heads
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2008, 03:41:19 pm »
In a recent mag (Chevy Hi-performance I believe), they tested out an 18" long collector extension made an appreciable amount of horsepower gain over no extension on the end of a 4 into 1 header. I think it was around 15-20 HP on a 500 HP motor.
85 Chevy Silverado C10 short, wide, yellow, 2wd. Lowered, 60-over 350 with Dart Iron Eagle heads and Comp Cams XE268 cam, TH350 w/ shift kit, 3.40 Gov-lok 12 bolt.

Offline Blue 82

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
Re: 96- heads
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2008, 07:36:50 pm »
In a recent mag (Chevy Hi-performance I believe), they tested out an 18" long collector extension made an appreciable amount of horsepower gain over no extension on the end of a 4 into 1 header. I think it was around 15-20 HP on a 500 HP motor.

That probably has to do more with the header collector design than backpressure

short collectors or headers with un-equal length tubes will benefit from an extension

collector design has a lot to do with it

« Last Edit: May 14, 2008, 07:41:37 pm by Blue 82 »
82 stepside 2wd 355/th350/3.08 posi

Offline comp

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 125
  • 76-77-78
Re: 96- heads
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2008, 04:05:57 pm »
i think it was Low end torque in many engine's that like a little back-pressure,,,think it has to do with the pulse wave