Author Topic: The MPG thread.  (Read 15663 times)

Offline jimbo

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 113
The MPG thread.
« on: August 07, 2009, 09:11:08 pm »
I have been searching through several gas mileage posts and thought it would be an interesting idea to have a thread dedicated to individual trucks mpg and the specifications of said truck, for those of us wanting to improve our mileage, to reference.  I know it would interest me to see what different combinations are getting.  If you agree, post up.


I suppose I'll start.

1985 C10 Silverado lwb, 4bbl 305, 700r, 2.73 8.5 rear, 235/75/15's 128k miles. Everything is stone stock and untouched from the covered air intake in the grille and the charcoal air filter to the factory exhaust tips.  I have averaged 16mpg so far with no regard to trying to save gas.  Soon I'll do an all highway trip to calculate the high end of its mileage.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2009, 09:35:43 pm by jimbo »

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2009, 09:33:57 pm »
1985 C20 Scottsdale 454 4 speed factory original dual exhaust, no cats with 8600GVW, 3.21 14 bolt FF rear.  LT235 85R16 tires 140K miles, rural use 13 mpg and highway 15-16 driving easy
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline DnStClr

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1806
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2009, 09:49:06 pm »
87 R15 GMC (re-badged to a Silverado) 350, 700 R4, 3.08 open dif, 235-75R15 Michelin tires, dual exh, mostly rural driving- I get 17-18.6 mpg on 89 octane.
Don
87 Chevy Silverado

Offline BigHemi353

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 235
  • Diesel Enthusiast
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2009, 11:34:14 pm »
not sure on mine yet but the farm truck is a 85 C-20 with a crate 305, 700r4, thinking 3.73 gears, and all stock. getting about 9-10 doing farm chores and 13 highway(averaging 55-60mph). that was before the carb was tuned up and i havent found out the new yet.
-1986 Silverado K-20 6bt Cummins / NV4500/ np205- under construction

Offline Skunksmash

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1398
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2009, 12:15:50 pm »
87 R15 GMC (re-badged to a Silverado) 350, 700 R4, 3.08 open dif, 235-75R15 Michelin tires, dual exh, mostly rural driving- I get 17-18.6 mpg on 89 octane.

Dang i wish i got 17 MPG! Got a newer motor in there?


Guess mine's a bad example or something but: 1987 Silverado 2WD 5.7L 700R4 - 14.6 MPG mostly city driving. And i agree with the MPG quest, im on the same one. There are a few people here that are interested in it, although a few naysayers. I have been talking to one guy who built a vortec TBI 5.7L with 377 rear wheel hp, (that's like 450 flywheel) and he get's 19 MPG city and around 23 highway. He has it in a 86 blazer or something. It's not bull, he proved it over at Fullsizechevy. He said it's all in the tuning. There is also another guy over there who claims 21 mpg city, but no real performance upgrades. He has some kind of weird intake thing going on where he stacked up some throttle body spacers, and did a couple other mods. Might want to take a look over there. But it's mostly trucks that are newer than ours.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2009, 12:24:12 pm by Skunksmash »

Offline dumbucket1

  • Too Many Trucks
  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 597
  • Coal Hauler
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2009, 02:18:57 pm »
I have never been able to get more than 8 to 13mpg out of any 73-87 I have ever owned. But my 91 c1500 with a 305, th350 and 3.08 gets consistent 17mpg mixed and my 94 k1500 with 350 4l60e and 3.42 gears gets a consistant 18mpg mixed driving.
Chevy and GMC trucks ranging from 1973 to 2007

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2009, 07:47:03 pm »
16 sounds about right;  You did read my exhaustive/scientific thread on this?

There's going to be even more to the story soon----i have an interesting twist.


Offline DnStClr

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1806
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2009, 08:45:25 pm »
Most of my driving is a 23 mile trip to work and back. Not a lot of stop-and-go. Usually 55 or less..
Don
87 Chevy Silverado

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19190
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2009, 09:08:10 am »
I've never calculated my mileage nor could I ever be bothered to. I just enjoy driving and put gas in when I need it. If you are going to try to average what people are getting for mileage you should set some stipulations for calculating it and method of calculation so everyone who participates gives accurate #s
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline Lt.Del

  • Andy aka:SgtDel
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3864
  • DelbridgePhotography.com
    • www.delbridge.net
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2009, 09:27:09 am »
i have a little notepad in each of my trucks.  It has been a habit of mine, each time I put gas in it, i record the mileage odometer, the price paid and gallons put in.  Whenever I put gas in it, it is always to fill it up.  Anyone want to know what the price of gas was in '96?  I have it in notepad  ;D

That way I know what my mpg is if I feel like doing a little math.  I always know how many miles i got on the previous tank.  I can usually go 400 miles on my 91 sub tank, and 200 miles on my 79 p/u 383 stroker tank.  They dont sound like good numbers, but, i never run the tanks too low and nearly everwhere I go is within 4 miles of my house (work, shopping, daycare, etc) Lots of urban driving. By recording mileage, I will see if the numbers slip any which indicates I should look at something w/ the truck. Any dip in mileage b/w fill ups is a good indicator for a tune up or something--all else the same (highway vs. city, load vs. no load, angry heavy foot vs. relaxing sunday drive, etc..)

It also allows me to compare one year versus the next or whatever time period if I change something like tires/wheels
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 10:24:45 am by SgtDel »

Offline 69byrd

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1167
  • Haulin!
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2009, 09:42:22 am »
84 C-10 stepside it has a GM Preformance 350, long tube headers dual exaust, th350 and 2.73 gears, 20" wheels and I get 15 mph on rural roads. I haven't made any long highway trips to check that yet.
84 C-10 Stepside       
54 Chevy Truck
Gotta Love Those Stepsides!
http://s493.photobucket.com/albums/rr299/69byrd/?start=all

Offline Armor

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 139
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2009, 11:22:08 am »
79 c10 stock 305, 2 barrel, th350 tranny, i get 15-18 mpg usually, less if i hammer it of course. next week in swapping in a rebuilt 350 and 700r4, so ill update after that when i get numbers in(hoping for a boost lol)

Offline nico

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 50
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2009, 12:58:31 pm »
I am very proud of my setup... 1984 SWB with a 383, 280H cam, 750 Speed Demon Carb, 3.73 gears and a 700R4... Got 12.5 mpg on our last club cruise, and I think I could get to 14 mpg by dropping the secondary jet size and resetting the idle mixture.
White 1984 Silverado - Factory Paint, Factory Interior, and only 25k miles...

SOLD - Tan 1984 Silverado - 383, 700R4, Detroit Locker & 3.73's...

Offline eventhorizon66

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1909
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2009, 04:37:03 pm »
I am very proud of my setup... 1984 SWB with a 383, 280H cam, 750 Speed Demon Carb, 3.73 gears and a 700R4... Got 12.5 mpg on our last club cruise, and I think I could get to 14 mpg by dropping the secondary jet size and resetting the idle mixture.

LOL.  If the size of your secondary jetting affects your fuel economy at all, you are driving too aggressively to get any decent mpg.
'85 C10 SWB 350 700R4 TKO600

Offline jimbo

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 113
Re: The MPG thread.
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2009, 08:20:12 pm »
I've never calculated my mileage nor could I ever be bothered to. I just enjoy driving and put gas in when I need it. If you are going to try to average what people are getting for mileage you should set some stipulations for calculating it and method of calculation so everyone who participates gives accurate #s

Well I do calculate it, as well as do most of my friends, so it is something that I am interested in.  I have toy/drag cars that I don't bother calculating mpg on, but anything that I drive with some frequency or work with, I usually always do.
As for setting stipulations, I guess this thread is a bit more informal than that, and I'm fine with that..