Author Topic: the five liter family  (Read 14648 times)

Offline Layne

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
the five liter family
« on: November 05, 2009, 08:06:25 pm »
So we all know that the 305 is a decent motor for your everyday driver.  But let's discuss the other ones - 301 302 and the 307.  Are they worth their salt economically, best bang for the buck, or are they just another really good boat anchor?
77 c-10 - 77 400 86 700r4 "Emmy"
83 citation - 2.5L Four on the Floor!
88 sierra - reman 350 700r4 "Eleanor"
All normal practicality and rational money handling goes out of the window when it comes to my truck.

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2009, 09:02:42 pm »
The 301 is a Pontiac motor, that one for the most part is junk.  The GM 302 was one good running motor in a 69 Camaro.  It was a combination of a 283 and 327 if my memory serves me.  The 307 was a decent offering, had an old Chevelle with one in it, had no complaints.
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline dumbucket1

  • Too Many Trucks
  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 597
  • Coal Hauler
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2009, 09:37:25 pm »
Actually the pontiac 301 is a very good motor and great on gas. Personal experience
Chevy and GMC trucks ranging from 1973 to 2007

Offline zieg85

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7595
    • 73-87 GM squarebody extended cab and conversions up to 91 R/V series
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2009, 09:40:55 pm »
Actually the pontiac 301 is a very good motor and great on gas. Personal experience

I didn't mean to "dis" the 301, I just remember replacing a bunch of them in the early 80's because they blew up.  I remember fitting a Pontiac 400 in place of the 301 in a 78 Grand Prix, boy that car flew...
Carl 
1985 C20 Scottsdale 7.4L 4 speed 3.21
1986 C10 under construction
https://www.facebook.com/groups/248658382003506/

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19189
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2009, 09:46:24 pm »
There's a 307 in my 74 blazer (being replaced with a 462 bb) It's a dog. I can honestly say it feels a little more peppy than a 305 though.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline Layne

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2009, 10:42:33 pm »
I had a 79 GP with a 301. It leaked out of every thing imaginable- even the diff leaked. lol. That was when I was 15 and didn't know anything about cars.  Had it for a week and it was one of those "back 40" cars, you know the ones that aren't road worthy, but sure were fun in the back yard :P
77 c-10 - 77 400 86 700r4 "Emmy"
83 citation - 2.5L Four on the Floor!
88 sierra - reman 350 700r4 "Eleanor"
All normal practicality and rational money handling goes out of the window when it comes to my truck.

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2009, 11:27:37 pm »
i personally love all the small inch gm v-8's:  The vsbc (very small block chevy), the ssbc (small, small block chevy---262, 265, 267 etc.), the smog-era motors and the like.  i guess you had to be there;  imagine an 84 grand prix with a 305.  Man, those were great times.

1) 301.  i think these pontiacs(also from personal experience, 265) were very dependable, smooth running engines.

2) Oldsmoboggie had their 260, and their own 307

3) Right now, i've got a 305 in the truck.  Yes, there is an immediate feel of lesser power and torque as compared to the 350 crate that was in there previously, but it runs great and gets the job done.

a) Again, i'm wondering why no one has taken a stock 305 and simply bolted a 6-71 blower on top;  i think this would put all doubts towards the 305's performance potential to rest.   i plan to do this, if and when my planets align.

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19189
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2009, 05:07:13 am »
Most people wouldn't put the kind of $ into supercharging a 305 when they can build a 350 for the same price with better end results.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline slammed79

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
  • Thou shalt not drive stock
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2009, 07:15:34 am »
The 305 is a decent little engine. I had the privilege of driving a real X code 302 and that little beast kept me pretty planted, course the 4.10 gearset was a help. My ex-wifes father has a 58 impala that I think has a 265 in it, a cruiser.

  In my humble opinion the big inch small blocks are where its at unless all you wanna do is cruise, low and slow. And these days I'm all about low and slow, but I like having the ability to embarrass some one at the end of my right foot.

D
74 C10 Long bed 350/SM465 Lowered on 20's

Praise the lowered

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2009, 08:42:00 am »
Most people wouldn't put the kind of $ into supercharging a 305 when they can build a 350 for the same price with better end results.

Agreed.  But my point was, you can pretty much get 305's for next to nothing as they are practically falling out of trees and with the investment of a 6-71 (what, like 2 grand) you would have an amazing performer for only 2grand and also putting to rest the dubious performance reputation of 305's (which, in my opinion is undeserved).

Offline SUX2BU99

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1478
    • My Cardomain Site. Truck is on Page 6.
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2009, 10:32:52 am »
^ The problem with sinking 2k at least into a 6-71 on a 305 is putting all that strain of positive pressure inside a motor that was at best built to withstand maybe 180 HP. I could see bent and broken internal parts in short order.

My dad had a 81 Regal with a 267 2bbl and a 2.29 rear end  :o  Yeah it was pretty wimpy but oddly could beat my brother's friends mom's 84 Cutlass with a 305 4bbl in a race, but my dad's 2nd wife 78 Omega with a 305 4bbl felt consideraly gutsier than the Regal did.

My first vehicle I ever had was an 81 Jimmy 2wd Sierra Classic with a 305 2bbl, TH350 and I'm not sure what rear end but it had a Gov-lok. Nasty slow but could almost edge out a 83 C10 2wd longbox 305 4bbl with straight pipes  lol  Even with the top off, it wouldn't turn the tires on pavement.

2 305's I did like were the 180 HP HO that came in the 83-84 Z28's and TransAms with that motor as an option. Also came with a 5 speed and 3.73 gov-lok rear. The other was the 235 HP 5.0 TPI in the 91-92 Z28s. With a 5 speed, it was a mid-14 sec car I think.

The 307 as I understand it was a stroked 283 and the 327 was a bored-out 307. The 350 then was a stroked 327.
85 Chevy Silverado C10 short, wide, yellow, 2wd. Lowered, 60-over 350 with Dart Iron Eagle heads and Comp Cams XE268 cam, TH350 w/ shift kit, 3.40 Gov-lok 12 bolt.

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19189
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2009, 08:14:46 pm »
Boosting a stock 305 will = engine failure
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline jaredts

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1330
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2009, 09:29:29 pm »
Interesting debate.  This has all been played out many times before, but I can't resist.  I had a '79 monte carlo with a good running 305.  Very happy with it.  I also had an '87 camaro with a 305 and a e4me quadrajet with an overdrive transmission (700r4, I think).  That thing would absolutely fly.  I can only assume it was all stock.  On the other hand I don't think I could ever be satisfied with one in these trucks.  I'd rather have a 250 straight six.  Supercharge one might be interesting but it wouldn't make much sense.  Displacement is cheap.

Offline Layne

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2009, 10:29:20 pm »
Right! I had a 250 in mine and loved it, but the 400 is much better for my taste! :D I've seen a lot of debate with the 305, but I was curious about the other mouse motors and wanted to know if they had the same boringness. Lol.
77 c-10 - 77 400 86 700r4 "Emmy"
83 citation - 2.5L Four on the Floor!
88 sierra - reman 350 700r4 "Eleanor"
All normal practicality and rational money handling goes out of the window when it comes to my truck.

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: the five liter family
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2009, 10:51:40 pm »
^ The problem with sinking 2k at least into a 6-71 on a 305 is putting all that strain of positive pressure inside a motor that was at best built to withstand maybe 180 HP. I could see bent and broken internal parts in short order.


Boosting a stock 305 will = engine failure

Obviously, on a totally stock engine, namely a 305, you don't want to get to crazy with the boost;  i'm thinking (will do more research) 14lbs in very occasional short spurts would be ok if we assume a stock compression ratio of 7.5 to 1.   Up to 7lbs should be ok all the time.

i think high RPM is way more detrimental than pressure on the pistons/rods/crank etc.

Will clarify further later;  Too tired now.