Author Topic: Too much cam?  (Read 10969 times)

Offline Sprinkler-Man

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 76
  • 80 GMC Sierra Classic 4x4
Too much cam?
« on: April 04, 2016, 12:45:50 pm »
I friend of mine had gotten a hold of a rebuilt high performance short block Chevy 350.  There was no spec on the cam but everything in it was hi-perf so I finished building the engine.  It turns out that the cam is pretty radical and the engine produces very little vacuum.  After talking to some transmission rebuilders they have basically told me that with my rear end gear ratio (3.73 I think) and large tires (40) the engine will not run well because of the low RPMs.  They suggested a rear end ratio of about 5.38  Should I get a new set of gears or replace the cam and lifters?  They also suggested dumping the TH350 for a TH400 to handle the power better but then I would have to change that transfer case input and adapter......Ugh...Any suggestions?

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19175
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2016, 01:13:48 pm »
If you are going to do a trans swap, go to a 700R4 but if your cam is too aggressive, swap it out for a milder cam
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠¯¯¯¯¯'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline blazer74

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
  • Newbie
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2016, 03:58:47 pm »
With 40's 5.38 gears wouldn't be a bad idea anyway.

TH400 has a higher first gear than 350 or a 700 making your problem worse.
700 has the lowest.

Your going to be unhappy with a large cam with your setup. Your going to need higher stall converter to get power down low  and that means heat for the trans.

Offline Sprinkler-Man

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 76
  • 80 GMC Sierra Classic 4x4
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2016, 06:51:56 pm »
Will a 700R4 work for a 1980 GMC?  I am not up on my transmissions and the electronics they may need.

Offline SomeTexan

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • No such thing as too much hp
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2016, 07:54:18 pm »
Will a 700R4 work for a 1980 GMC?  I am not up on my transmissions and the electronics they may need.
It doesn't need electronics. Just s TV cable instead of a kickdown cable. Personally, I wouldn't run one with that much tire. That's a lot of extra stress on a known weak trans. A 4L60 is the electronic version and the 4L80 is the beefy electronic overdrive trans. Now, a 4L80 with a transmission controller would be as bulletproof as you can go. A built 200r4 is better than the pos 700r4, but I don't think they ever made a 4wd version. I would stick with what you have or go with the 4L80. If your truck is used for more than mall crawling or makes any power at all, you will end up with a pile of 700r4 parts and a hatred for them. There is a reason people have replaced them with 350 and 400's ever since they came out.
86 swb c10, LQ4/glide with 80mm turbo

Offline blazer74

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
  • Newbie
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2016, 08:06:17 pm »
If you have a 205 transfer case the 700 needs an output shaft change I believe.
The 700's were in front of 208 and 241 if I recall.

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19175
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2016, 08:15:20 pm »
Will a 700R4 work for a 1980 GMC?  I am not up on my transmissions and the electronics they may need.
It doesn't need electronics. Just s TV cable instead of a kickdown cable. Personally, I wouldn't run one with that much tire. That's a lot of extra stress on a known weak trans. A 4L60 is the electronic version and the 4L80 is the beefy electronic overdrive trans. Now, a 4L80 with a transmission controller would be as bulletproof as you can go. A built 200r4 is better than the pos 700r4, but I don't think they ever made a 4wd version. I would stick with what you have or go with the 4L80. If your truck is used for more than mall crawling or makes any power at all, you will end up with a pile of 700r4 parts and a hatred for them. There is a reason people have replaced them with 350 and 400's ever since they came out.

There is no 4L80 only 4L80E, the 4L60 is a 700R4, the 4L60E is the electronic version, it' a 2004R and is not advantageous to run in one of these trucks. I have ran the 700R4/4L60 behind big blocks and high output small blocks with great success for many years so I would not call it a POS. If you take a stock unit out of a junker and stick it behind a powerhouse yes it will fail & by comparison to the TH400 which was essentially bullet proof can be put behind a stout engine without modification and will likely survive. If you want to limit your streetability then that is the cheapest way out. If you want to maximize your street performance then look at the 4 speed options. 700R4 is easily upgraded and affordable. Nevertheless, the trans isn't the issue here, you shouldn't build your driveline around a camshaft that you didn't select.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠¯¯¯¯¯'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline FlatBlack77

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 894
  • Cheap Fast Reliable - Pick 2
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2016, 10:16:39 pm »
me personally i would swap out the cam for one that is going to give you more power down in the lower rpms. if the cam is really that radical than no matter what transmission you go with you are going to need a high stall converter as said above and thats getting into alot more work than a simple cam change
"When you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail"
'77 C/10 - 350/350 mild street motor

Offline blazer74

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
  • Newbie
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2016, 10:23:33 pm »
me personally i would swap out the cam for one that is going to give you more power down in the lower rpms. if the cam is really that radical than no matter what transmission you go with you are going to need a high stall converter as said above and thats getting into alot more work than a simple cam change


Agreed ^^^

Offline roundhouse

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Newbie
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2016, 06:32:18 am »
You running 40s and 3:73s ?

How do you get it  to start moving ?
I assume stock Dana 44 front and 10 bolt rear?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Sprinkler-Man

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 76
  • 80 GMC Sierra Classic 4x4
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2016, 12:58:12 pm »
Running 35's with 3.73 right now but wanted to step it up to 40's.  I was running a 2500 stall until the TH350 stopped working.  The truck never felt like there was any power to it, probably because the motor was never in it's power range.  I am going to take out the cam and replace it with something more street worthy and some low end torque.  So it looks like the order I need to proceed is 1)pick out a new cam 2)pick out a transmission 3)with all this known pick out the correct set of gears to keep the motor in the power range at highway speeds?   

Offline Sprinkler-Man

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 76
  • 80 GMC Sierra Classic 4x4
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2016, 01:07:01 pm »
Will a 700R4 work for a 1980 GMC?  I am not up on my transmissions and the electronics they may need.
It doesn't need electronics. Just s TV cable instead of a kickdown cable. Personally, I wouldn't run one with that much tire. That's a lot of extra stress on a known weak trans. A 4L60 is the electronic version and the 4L80 is the beefy electronic overdrive trans. Now, a 4L80 with a transmission controller would be as bulletproof as you can go. A built 200r4 is better than the pos 700r4, but I don't think they ever made a 4wd version. I would stick with what you have or go with the 4L80. If your truck is used for more than mall crawling or makes any power at all, you will end up with a pile of 700r4 parts and a hatred for them. There is a reason people have replaced them with 350 and 400's ever since they came out.

There is no 4L80 only 4L80E, the 4L60 is a 700R4, the 4L60E is the electronic version, it' a 2004R and is not advantageous to run in one of these trucks. I have ran the 700R4/4L60 behind big blocks and high output small blocks with great success for many years so I would not call it a POS. If you take a stock unit out of a junker and stick it behind a powerhouse yes it will fail & by comparison to the TH400 which was essentially bullet proof can be put behind a stout engine without modification and will likely survive. If you want to limit your streetability then that is the cheapest way out. If you want to maximize your street performance then look at the 4 speed options. 700R4 is easily upgraded and affordable. Nevertheless, the trans isn't the issue here, you shouldn't build your driveline around a camshaft that you didn't select.

Doesn't the 700R4 have a electronic locking stall converter?

Offline frotosride

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1428
    • WFO CONCEPTS
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2016, 05:21:27 pm »
Will a 700R4 work for a 1980 GMC?  I am not up on my transmissions and the electronics they may need.

Doesn't the 700R4 have a electronic locking stall converter?

Yes it is a locking trans but it is very simple to hook up plus unlike the later electronic transmissios it doesn't have to have any power to run. You could do the swap and run the truck until you decided to hook it up.
"Beat it like a red-headed ford"
1987 v10 Silverado(LQ4), 87 R10,83 K20, 83 cucv 6.2 Detroit
2006 Boulevard M109R 109 cid,2019 M109R BOSS
2009 Jeep XK, (future LS Swap)
GSXR 750 engine awaiting go kart

Offline frotosride

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1428
    • WFO CONCEPTS
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2016, 05:25:11 pm »
If you decide to get a 700r-4 make sure it is 1987 and up...the casings were stringer as well as most of the internals!
"Beat it like a red-headed ford"
1987 v10 Silverado(LQ4), 87 R10,83 K20, 83 cucv 6.2 Detroit
2006 Boulevard M109R 109 cid,2019 M109R BOSS
2009 Jeep XK, (future LS Swap)
GSXR 750 engine awaiting go kart

Offline Irish_Alley

  • Tim
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13333
  • Family is not an important thing. It's everything.
Re: Too much cam?
« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2016, 09:05:00 am »
i know these guys covered the trans issue. but whats your plans for the truck? mud, trail or just a road truck or even just one that is a trailer queen?
If you can’t tell yourself the truth, who can you tell it to?~Irish_Alley

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth ~Sherlock Holmes