Author Topic: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..  (Read 19978 times)

Offline rakedc10

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 19
This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« on: May 15, 2007, 11:10:10 am »
is it possible to put a foreign engine such as a high output sr20 or rb-series motor in a 73-87.....im just thinking about gas and i was like heck, lets put in a 400+ hp nissan engine in it..hahah

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19180
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2007, 02:36:37 pm »
 ??? Banned!!!


Sr20? lol seriously that's fine and all in a tin can lil nissan but you're talking about a heavy truck and by the time you were done trying to fab that lil 4 banger in there you would have exceeded the $ fuel economy savings if there even was any
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline Stewart G Griffin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3324
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2007, 04:32:48 pm »
I've been thinking about possible combinations too.

And, i think i'm going to try the 4cylinder deactivation route----by taking the pushrods out of cyls 1,4,6, and 7.

I contemplated sleving down the cylinders or getting a remanufactured 262 (the one that was in the monza) but i think the cylinder deactivation plan is the cheapest way to go.

So, a 350 would be 175 CID and a 305 would be 153 CID.

We are looking at a 25%-35% increase in MPG.   I let you know how it goes.

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19180
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2007, 07:53:00 pm »
Are you serious? lol - Cmon guys if you really want to getter better fuel economy buy a honda and drive that daily. When you want to use your truck use it as a truck.

You cannot simply remove the pushrods and expect your engine to last very long. The air in the cylinders needs to be pumped in and out for efficiency and prolonged life. The proper way to reduce fuel consumption with that type of idea would be to deactivate the fuel charge in those cylinders at cruising speeds. = Port fuel injection system
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline red4wd

  • Registered Users
  • *
  • Posts: 240
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2007, 09:47:37 pm »
With all due respect...and remember I said with all due respect...ah never mind

Offline Captkaos

  • OWNER and Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18461
    • http://www.73-87chevytrucks.com
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2007, 11:33:01 pm »
I've been thinking about possible combinations too.

And, i think i'm going to try the 4cylinder deactivation route----by taking the pushrods out of cyls 1,4,6, and 7.

I contemplated sleving down the cylinders or getting a remanufactured 262 (the one that was in the monza) but i think the cylinder deactivation plan is the cheapest way to go.

So, a 350 would be 175 CID and a 305 would be 153 CID.

We are looking at a 25%-35% increase in MPG.   I let you know how it goes.

That wouldn't be a good idea, as Vile descibed.  If you were running a sequential EFI system and deactivated the spark and fuel it at x load it would be fine, but removing pushrods is not a good idea.

Offline rakedc10

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 19
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2007, 11:04:38 am »
i kno i kno...lol, my friend was like hey....and i was like hmmm, prolly wont work, but lets ask...v8's all the way! ahah

Offline 75 C20

  • Frequent Member
  • **
  • Posts: 372
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2007, 08:55:44 pm »
Quote
is it possible to put a foreign engine such as a high output sr20 or rb-series motor in a 73-87.....I'm just thinking about gas and i was like heck, lets put in a 400+ hp nissan engine in it..hahah
??? ??? ??? ???
woo- i think if I'm gonna think about wanting 400 hp in my truck a nissan engine would be my last resort
I'm my opinion i buy these trucks because there American - built in America by Americans and i would never stick a jap 4 banger in one
Like the sticker on our air cleaners say - ;D
1975 Custom Deluxe 20 350 SM465 2WD Longbed
1979 Custom Deluxe 20 400 SM465 2WD Longbed
1968 Custom Sport Truck 20 327 TH400 2WD Longbed
1985 Silverado 10 305 700R4 2WD Longbed
1969 Pontiac GTO 400 Turbo350
2008 GMC 2500HD 6.0 6spd 4X4 Longbed

Offline joesgarage71

  • Wrench
  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1156
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2007, 08:35:51 am »
 When I was in school for mechanics (DBCC Daytona) one of the classes did the deactivate thing on a 318 mopar. They removed the push rods and the plugs,And something with the carb,Can't quite remember. It was pretty loud though.
  Steve
78' K-20 355/SM465/twin stick 205 6" on 36's
14 bolt FF/big bearing Dana 44 4.56 gears

92' GMC C-1500 454/4L80E/14 bolt

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19180
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2007, 04:37:32 pm »
I have a V8 350 I built that runs on the stand. Half of the engine is cut away. I built this engine myself to show my students what a running engine really looks like. This works well on a stand but would never be practical in a vehicle. I can post pics if anyone is interested.
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline Captkaos

  • OWNER and Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18461
    • http://www.73-87chevytrucks.com
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2007, 05:18:16 pm »
We had a friend that used a V8 Ford engine and used one bank of cylinders to fill an air tank.

Offline 123 pugsy

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 925
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #11 on: May 22, 2007, 05:20:21 am »
I have a V8 350 I built that runs on the stand. Half of the engine is cut away. I built this engine myself to show my students what a running engine really looks like. This works well on a stand but would never be practical in a vehicle. I can post pics if anyone is interested.

I'd love to see pics. :o
Pugsy
76 C10 LWB
TPI 350

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19180
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #12 on: May 22, 2007, 01:10:04 pm »
Here's a few pix... I was gonna take a quick video but I ran out of gas  :-\





,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline VileZambonie

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19180
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #13 on: May 22, 2007, 01:12:25 pm »
GRRR You really can't see good because of the post pic size restriction  >:(
,                           ___ 
                         /  _ _ _\_
              ⌠ŻŻŻŻŻ'   [☼===☼]
              `()_);-;()_)--o--)_)

74 GMC, 75 K5, 84 GMC, 85 K20, 86 k20, 79 K10

Offline 123 pugsy

  • Junior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 925
Re: This sounds like a ridiculous engine swap, but..
« Reply #14 on: May 22, 2007, 07:27:46 pm »
That's cool. ;D So it actually runs OK on 4 cylinders? Does it shake alot?
Pugsy
76 C10 LWB
TPI 350